Conceptualization, measurement, and application of quality of life for persons with intellectual disabilities: report of an international panel of experts.

By R. Schalock, I. Brown, Roy I. Brown, Robert Cummins, D. Felce, Leena M. Matikka, K. Keith, Trevor Parmenter. Mental Retardation, 2002

663 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e542e17038b0ab3f3be8d10f1b3744cda0e9906d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. N. Zuna
2. Mian Wang
3. Jenny Marcionetti
4. J. Summers
5. A. Turnbull
6. Sara Santilli
7. Roy I. Brown
8. J. Rossier

Citations in the corpus

• Relationship of Perceived Adequacy of Services, Family–Professional Partnerships, and Family Quality of Life in Early Childhood Service Programmes (2007, background): “Researchers have proposed the concept of quality of life (Gardner, 2001; Schalock & Verdugo-Alonso, 2002; Schalock et al., 2002; Wehmeyer & Schalock, 2001) as an appropriate outcome for provision of comprehensive services to children and adults with disabilities.”
• Career Adaptability, Hope, Optimism, and Life Satisfaction in Italian and Swiss Adolescents (2017, background): “In regard to the quality of life concept, Schalock et al. (2002) considered the term ‘‘quality’’ as related to human values (e.g., happiness, satisfaction, and health) and the term ‘‘life’’ as referred to the important aspects of human existence (e.g., health, family, and work).”
• Assessing the validity of impact pathways for child labour and well-being in social life cycle assessment (2009, background): “6 See also Martel and Dupuis (2006); Galloway (2006); Diener and Biswas-Diener (2002); Diener et al. (2002); Schalock et al. (2002); Michalos (2001); Cummins (2000); Felce and Perry (1996); Carley (1981) 7 The mentioned literature deals with several different and closely related constructs.”
• Family Quality of Life: A Framework for Policy and Social Service Provisions to Support Families of Children With Disabilities (2009, background): “Similar to many individual QOL domains (Schalock et al., 2002), the six individual-oriented domains of FQoL consist of Advocacy, Emotional Well-being, Health, Physical Environment, Productivity, and Social WellBeing.”
• Assessing Family Outcomes: Psychometric Evaluation of the Beach Center Family Quality of Life Scale (2006, background): “…quality of life as a multidimensional construct has matured significantly over the past 20 years (Cummins, 1997; Felce, 1997; Goode, 1997; Schalock et al., 2002), expanding to include such factors as emotional wellbeing, interpersonal relationships, material wellbeing, personal…”
• A Social Validation Assessment of Microswitch-Based Programs for Persons with Multiple Disabilities Employing Teacher Trainees and Parents as Raters (2006, background): “The choice of stimulation strategies may be based on the view that they can promote periods of positive relationship between staff or parents and students (Green and Reid, 1996, 1999; Schalock et al., 2002).”
• Theorizing About Family Quality of Life (2010, background): “Examples include early intervention agencies serving young children with disabilities and their families, developmental disabilities agencies that provide supports and services to children and adults with disabilities, or family support programs such as Parent to Parent ( Santelli, Turnbull, Marquis”
• Quality of Life, Event Impacts, and Mega-Event Support among South African Residents before and after the 2010 FIFA World Cup (2013, background): “, life satisfaction, happiness) (Schalock et al. 2002).”