Regulatory Economics: Twenty Years of Progress?
By M. Crew, Paul R. Kleindorfer. 2002
171 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e5292b0b5904c8eccae8fbcc8c157eaa8ad256cb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Management Science and Operations Research
Citations in the corpus
- Electricity Transmission Pricing and Performance-based Regulation (2006, unknown): “Crew and Kleindorfer (2002) severely criticize (a) that the approach spends no intellectual effort on the derivation of the probability distribution F( θ ) and (b) that F( θ ) is assumed to be common knowledge.”
- Incentive regulation and investment: evidence from European energy utilities (2010, methodology): “The theoretical framework for our analysis draws on the literature that studies the implications of different forms of regulation for capital investment decisions ( Crew and Kleindorfer 1996, 2002; Vogelsang 2002; Joskow 2008).”
- Regulating Infrastructure: The Impact on Risk and Investment (2006, unknown): “This literature, which has been criticized by Crew and Kleindorfer (2002) for assuming that regulators have access to information unavailable to them in practice, derives policies that enable the regulator to induce the firm to use its private information in a way that benefits society as a whole…”
- China's Renewable Energy Policy: Commitments and Challenges (2010, background): “This pricing mechanism offers little incentive for firms to improve efficiency because profit is more related to the size of investment than high efficiency (Crew and Kleindorfer, 2002).”
- Electricity sector reform in developing countries : a survey of empirical evidence on determinants and performance (2005, unknown): “Recent theoretical developments in regulatory economics have not been able to resolve the increasing demand for sustainable regulatory design and process (Crew and Kleindorfer, 2002).”