The combinatorial distance geometry method for the calculation of molecular conformation. I. A new approach to an old problem.
By Timothy F. Havel, Irwin D. Kuntz, G. Crippen. 1983
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Regina Barzilay
- Tommi S. Jaakkola
- Connor W. Coley
- Octavian-Eugen Ganea
- Percy Liang
- William H. Green Jr.
- Yoshua Bengio
- Lagnajit Pattanaik
Citations in the corpus
- Protein 3D Structure Computed from Evolutionary Sequence Variation (2011, neutral): “magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy [52] (Text S1).”
- Protein structure prediction from sequence variation (2012, methodology): “P E R S P E C T I V E n p g riance scores using a standard distance geometry algorithm, first pio-neered and then ubiquitously used to solve three-dimensional structures with experimental constraints deduced from NMR spectroscopy data 41 .”
- 3D Protein Structure Predicted from Sequence (2011, unknown): “the family (Table S1) we used well-‐established distance geometry algorithms, as used for structure determination by NMR spectroscopy [50] (Box 1, Text S1).”
- GeoMol: Torsional Geometric Generation of Molecular 3D Conformer Ensembles (2021, background): “Subsequently, the corresponding 3D atom coordinates are learned to approximately match these predicted distances [Havel et al., 1983b,a, Crippen et al., 1988, Havel, 1998, Lagorce et al., 2009, Riniker and Landrum, 2015].”
- A topology‐constrained distance network algorithm for protein structure determination from NOESY data (2005, unknown): “30–32 The process of determining sequence-specific resonance assignments provide a set R of protein nuclei resonance frequencies assigned to specific atoms of the protein structure [ R (cid”