Perceptual dominance during lipreading

By R. D. Easton, M. Basala. 1982

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Assessing the Role of the ‘Unity Assumption’ on Multisensory Integration: A Review (2017, background): “In addition, the congruency of stimulus identity modulates the extent to which people integrate multisensory speech stimuli (Easton and Basala, 1982; Munhall et al., 1996; though see Green et al., 1991).”
Audiovisual multisensory integration (2007, background): “to identify speech stimuli, at least when the observers are familiar with the speakers in the video-clips (see [48,49]; though see also [50] for null results).”
LipNet: End-to-End Sentence-level Lipreading (2016, methodology): “According to the literature, the accuracy of human lipreaders is around 20% (Easton & Basala, 1982; Hilder et al., 2009).”
Facilitation of multisensory integration by the "unity effect" reveals that speech is special. (2008, methodology): “This suggests less multisensory integration of the stimuli in the mismatched condition (Vatakis & Spence, 2007; for converging findings from earlier studies of speech perception, see Easton & Basala, 1982; Walker et al., 1995).”
Visual attention modulates audiovisual speech perception (2004, background): “Easton and Basala (1982) have reported that in an audiovisual word recognition task, subjects exhibited no visual influence when they were instructed to base their judgments of incongruent audiovisual speech on what they heard.”
Crossmodal binding: Evaluating the “unity assumption” using audiovisual speech stimuli (2007, background): “ Easton and Basala (1982) reported two experiments in which they assessed the ability of participants to lip-read (monosyllabic and/or compound words) under conditions of unimodal visual presentation rather than under conditions of discrepant visual-auditory presentation (i.e., by varying the degre”
Rules of intersensory integration in spatial scene analysis and speechreading (2001, background): “Green, Kuhl, Meltzoff and Stevens (1991) found that face-voice gender discrepancy did not affect the size of the illusion, but Easton and Basala (1982) found a smaller McGurk effect.”