The Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index

262 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Effects of Schumpeterian and Kirznerian entrepreneurship on economic growth: panel data evidence (2017, background): “…this inverse relationship in describing a convex curve representing the relationship between entrepreneurship and per capita GDP (Acs, Audretsch, and Evans 1994; Wennekers and Thurik 1999), whilst others point to the existence of a cubic relationship between the variables (Acs and Szerb 2010).”
National Systems of Entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications (2014, background): “…conceive of National Systems of Entrepreneurship as a dynamic interaction between entrepreneurial attitudes, ability, and aspirations; consider entrepreneurial processes within their institutional contexts; and recognize the multifaceted, multi-level nature of the phenomenon (Acs et al., 2013).”
Religious institutions and entrepreneurship (2014, result): “This index, in contrast to the GEM index, presents the theoretical assumed linear relationship between entrepreneurship and economic development (Acs and Autio 2010).”
Economic and political institutions and entry into formal and informal entrepreneurship (2014, unknown): “This is important because the potential of different forms of entrepreneurial activity (e.g., formal or informal; strategic or non-strategic) to contribute to economic growth can vary considerably (Acs & Amorós, 2008; Acs et al., 2014a, b; Baumol, 1990; Stenholm, Acs, & Wuebker, 2013).”