Economic and political institutions and entry into formal and informal entrepreneurship
By Erkko Autio, Kun Fu. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2014
370 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Business and International Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d17d0d788963c97e865ff64c739bf06ef1aa3ff2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Business and International Management
- Anis Omri
- Colin Williams
- M. Shahid
- Sebastian Aparicio
- David B. Audretsch
- Zoltan J. Acs
- Erkko Autio
- David Urbano
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- David Urbano
- Sebastian Aparicio
- David B. Audretsch
- Zoltan J. Acs
- Erkko Autio
- J. Levie
- M. Shahid
- E. Stam
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Citations in the corpus
- Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what has been learned? (2019, background): “…Gomez (2004), Stenholm et al. (2013), Valdez and Richardson (2013). related with access to stock markets (Bruton et al. 2009), the financial system (Autio and Fu 2015; Klapper et al. 2006), hiring and firing rules and controls (Goltz et al. 2015; van Stel et al. 2007), political structure…”
- Perceived public support and entrepreneurship attitudes: A little reciprocity can go a long way! (2020, background): “In this regard, it has been observed in the past that favourable institutions and policies encourage entrepreneurial activity (Autio & Fu, 2015), although the influence of such policies is sometimes debated and considered counterproductive (Acs, Åstebro, Audretsch, & Robinson, 2016; Shane, 2009).”
- Informal entrepreneurship and institutional theory: explaining the varying degrees of (in)formalization of entrepreneurs in Pakistan (2016, background): “Instead, most of the literature on informal entrepreneurship has simply examined how many entrepreneurs are informal (autio and Fu 2014; Williams 2013, Williams and Martinez-Perez 2014a) rather than how many display differing degrees of (in)formalization.”
- Factors Influencing Entrepreneurial Intention of University Students in China: Integrating the Perceived University Support and Theory of Planned Behavior (2021, background): “According to the literature, systems and policies in favor of entrepreneurship encourage entrepreneurial activities [9], and higher educational attainment increases the possibility of successfully establishing a company with a high growth potential [10,11].”
- Determinants of the Level of Informality of Informal Micro-Enterprises: Some Evidence from the City of Lahore, Pakistan (2016, background): “Moreover, nearly two-thirds of global enterprises have been argued to start-up unregistered and operating in the informal sector (Autio & Fu 2014).”
- Global entrepreneurship and institutions: an introduction (2014, methodology): “register with authorities) formed by combining survey-based GEM data with World Bank Enterprise Snapshot survey suggests dramatic cross-country differences in the levels of formal and informal entrepreneurial entries, respectively (Autio and Fu, 2013).”
- Informal Entrepreneurship in Developing Economies: The Impacts of Starting up Unregistered on firm Performance (2017, background): “…Theory and Practice published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of SAGE Publications Inc. developing world estimated to start up unregistered (Autio & Fu, 2015), advancing comprehension of the reasons for, and impacts of, nonregistration is crucial if the entrepreneurship process in…”
- Entrepreneurship and Sustainability: The Need for Innovative and Institutional Solutions (2017, background): “Similarly, Autio and Fu (2015) declare that a one standard deviation increase in the quality of economic and political institutions could double the rates of formal entrepreneurship and halve the rates of informal entrepreneurship.”