The effects of innovation–cost strategy, knowledge, and action in the supply chain on firm performance
By Christopher W. Craighead, G. Tomas M. Hult, Dave J. Ketchen. 2009
236 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e48b98b08ff28e0409bc6f6cb9aa3daa73c8b5bf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Strategy and Management
- Dave J. Ketchen
- Christopher W. Craighead
- G. Tomas M. Hult
- Kai Xu
- Chris Carnes
- Michael A. Hitt
- Kaitlin S. Dunn
- Shaukat A. Brah
Citations in the corpus
- From a systematic literature review to integrated definition for sustainable supply chain innovation (SSCI) (2017, unknown): “…strategy and system complexity are considered as key antecedents to innovations in supply chain (Autry and Griffis, 2008; Blome et al., 2013; Cheng et al., 2014; Choi and Krause, 2006; Craighead et al., 2009; Gualandris and Kalchschmidt, 2014; Panayides and Lun, 2009; Wagner and Bode, 2014).”
- Resource based theory in operations management research (2016, methodology): “For example, Craighead et al. (2009) developed their constructs by integrating arguments from RBT with the knowledge based view and strategic choice theory to show how the theories' complementarities can extend our knowledge of each.”
- Addressing Common Method Variance: Guidelines for Survey Research on Information Technology, Operations, and Supply Chain Management (2011, methodology): “Because CMV poses a significant threat to a study’s conclusions [17], [21], [66], we hope that authors and reviewers more fully address CMV in future research by bearing in mind the strategies summarized in Tables II and III when designing and evaluating research.”
- Linkages between firm innovation strategy, suppliers, product innovation, and business performance: Insights from resource dependence theory (2017, background): “The literature on product innovation argues that contextual variables including the extent of foreign collaboration, company age, current exports, annual revenue, and number of employees impact product innovation (Craighead et al., 2009; Kok and Biemans, 2009; Lau et al., 2010; Zhou and Wu, 2010).”