Large‐scale bioenergy from additional harvest of forest biomass is neither sustainable nor greenhouse gas neutral

324 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Assessing global land use : balancing consumption with sustainable supply (2014, background): “Moreover, also a growing use of forest harvest to produce biofuels may have negative consequences (Schulze et al. 2012).”
The ‘debt’ is in the detail: A synthesis of recent temporal forest carbon analyses on woody biomass for energy (2013, unknown): “Renew Sust Energ Rev 16(5):3176–3199 (2012).”
Does replacing coal with wood lower CO2 emissions? Dynamic lifecycle analysis of wood bioenergy (2018, background): “Further, typical plantations require periodic fertilization, increasing N2O emissions and worsening their climate impact beyondwhatwe report here (Schulze et al2012).”
Woody biomass energy potential in 2050 (2014, background): “Hence, the environmental consequences of extensive woody biomass use for energy may be less dramatic than some researchers have argued (Schulze et al., 2012).”