Woody biomass energy potential in 2050

By P. Lauri, Petr Havlík, G. Kindermann, N. Forsell, H. Böttcher, Michael Obersteiner. 2014

335 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Mechanics of Materials

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d30c68c6766b3e663a1040f435b1fc784862030e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

1. Felix Creutzig
2. Pete Smith
3. Gregory F. Nemet
4. Joeri Rogelj
5. W. Lamb
6. J. Minx
7. Gunnar Luderer
8. Richard Wood

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Sabine Fuss
2. J. Minx
3. W. Lamb
4. M. Callaghan
5. Felix Creutzig
6. Gregory F. Nemet
7. Pete Smith
8. Joeri Rogelj

Citations in the corpus

• Pathways to Shape the Bioeconomy (2017, background): “Even if there are some untapped potentials, mainly in Africa, Asia, and South America [61,62], biomass remains a scarce resource and different options for utilization should be balanced carefully.”
• Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects (2018, background): “Estimates for forestry-sourced bioenergy range from 38–165 EJ yr−1 (Smeets and Faaij 2007, Lauri et al 2014, Smeets et al 2007, Cornelissen et al 2012, Rogner et al 2012).”