The UKPDS risk engine: a model for the risk of coronary heart disease in Type II diabetes (UKPDS 56).

By Richard Stevens, V. Kothari, A. Adler, I. Stratton, Rury R. Holman. Clinical science, 2001

1,263 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e455c077164b70be490489735c7c2e8177477f28

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

1. Douglas G. Altman
2. M. Woodward
3. Karel G. M. Moons
4. Rury R. Holman
5. A. Kengne
6. V. Basevi
7. D. Avers

Citations in the corpus

• The metabolic syndrome: time for a critical appraisal (2005, neutral): “This problem stands in contrast to the Framingham [95] and UKPDS [99] risk models, in which the spectrum of severities is weighted, so that it is clear who may be at greater or lesser risk.”
• Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project. (2003, methodology): “This excess risk of diabetic persons is in part explained by ‘diabetes-related’ factors, such as type and duration of diabetes, glycaemic control, and presence of retinopathy or microalbuminuria or proteinuria.(53)”
• The CORE Diabetes Model: Projecting Long-term Clinical Outcomes, Costs and Costeffectiveness of Interventions in Diabetes Mellitus (Types 1 and 2) to Support Clinical and Reimbursement Decision-making (2004, methodology): “The risk model from the UKPDS risk engine is diabetes-specific and takes into account HbA 1c , SBP, lipid levels (total cholesterol to HDL ratio), age, sex, smoking status, race, and time since diagnosis of diabetes to calculate the probability of the first MI 44 .”
• Exercise and Type 2 Diabetes (2010, neutral): “The lower the CAD risk, the higher the chance of a false positive (79,248).”
• Risk prediction models: II. External validation, model updating, and impact assessment (2012, methodology): “equations The UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) CHD equation has been designed for risk evaluation for any duration of followup in a patient with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes, or who has had diabetes for a known length of time.(30) The Framingham Anderson CHD equation has been developed from ”
• Physical activity/exercise and type 2 diabetes. (2004, background): “For example, a 38-year-old Caucasian nonsmoking man with diabetes for 5 years, HbA1c 7.5%, systolic blood pressure 130 mmHg, total cholesterol 5.2 mmol/l, and HDL cholesterol 1.1 mmol/l would have a 10-year CAD risk of only 7.3% or ~0.7% per year, calculated using the U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study”
• Effectiveness of the diabetes education and self management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial (2008, background): “Although the risk estimate for cardiovascular disease from the United Kingdom prospective diabetes study”
• Physical Activity/Exercise and Type 2 Diabetes (2006, neutral): “Prosepctive Diabetes Study) Risk Engine (50) (http://www.”
• A model to estimate the lifetime health outcomes of patients with Type 2 diabetes: the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Outcomes Model (UKPDS no. 68) (2004, background): “The UKPDS Risk Engine, a risk calculator for estimating absolute risk of coronary heart disease [10] and stroke [11], has been developed based on factors such as age, sex, race, smoking status, and levels of HbA1c, systolic BP and lipid ratios in the first 2 years after diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes.”