Intractable Conflicts: Socio-Psychological Foundations and Dynamics
By D. Bar-Tal. 2013
350 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e44909b084d4167d60f08427a74d8a57fcc35f61
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Intergroup reconciliation: Instrumental and socio-emotional processes and the needs-based model (2015, background): “This is particularly so in protracted, seemingly intractable (Bar-Tal, 2013) conflicts characterised by reciprocal cycles of violence.”
- Emotions and Emotion Regulation in Intractable Conflict: Studying Emotional Processes Within a Unique Context (2015, background): “Ethos of Conflict is defined as “the configuration of central societal beliefs that provide dominant characterization to the society and gives it a particular orientation” (Bar-Tal, 2000, p. xiv).”
- Systemic perspectives on scaling agricultural innovations. A review (2016, background): “Similar ideas have been proposed in socio-psychological studies (e.g. Bar-Tal 2013), referring to people's histories and how their current actions may not connect to current (context) conditions , but to what they experienced in the past.”
- Emotion, Emotion Regulation, and Conflict Resolution (2014, background): “It is only natural to assume that conflict-related events would be appraised differently by individuals adhering to different ideological views, different values, and different beliefs and narratives about the conflict and the opponent (Bar-Tal, 2013; Jost, Federico, & Napier, 2009).”