Galaxy pairs in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey - IV: Interactions trigger AGN

By Sara L. Ellison, David R. Patton, J. Trevor Mendel, J. Scudder. 2011

250 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Galaxy-galaxy interactions are predicted to cause gas inflows leading to enhanced nuclear star formation. In this paper we test the further prediction that the gas inflows lead to enhanced accretion onto the central supermassive black hole, triggering activity in the nucleus. Based on a sample of 11,060 SDSS galaxies with a close companion (rp < 80 kpc, Delta V < 200 km/s), we classify AGN based either on emission line ratios or on spectral classification as a quasar. The AGN fraction in the close pairs sample is compared to a control sample of 110,600 mass- and redshift-matched control galaxies with no nearby companion. We find a clear increase in the AGN fraction in close pairs of galaxies with projected separations < 40 kpc by up to a factor of 2.5 relative to the control sample (although the enhancement depends on the chosen S/N cut of the sample). The increase in AGN fraction is strongest in equal mass galaxy pairings, and weakest in the lower mass component of an unequal mass pairing. The increased AGN fraction at small separations is accompanied by an enhancement in the number of `composite' galaxies whose spectra are the result of photoionization by both AGN and stars. Our results indicate that AGN activity occurs (at least in some cases) well before final coalescence and concurrently with ongoing star formation. Finally, we find a marked increase at small projected separations of the fraction of pairs in which BOTH galaxies harbour AGN. We demonstrate that the fraction of double AGN exceeds the expected random fraction, indicating that some pairs undergo correlated nuclear activity. Taken together with complimentary studies, we favour an interpretation where interactions trigger AGN, but are not the only cause of nuclear activity.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e400d1cc5c6ad0d0fec2c494af9b16829625c44e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. L. Hernquist
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. R. Somerville
  4. R. Dav'e
  5. Christopher J. Conselice
  6. Volker Springel
  7. Simon D. M. White
  8. A. Dekel

In Instrumentation

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. R. Somerville
  4. Christopher J. Conselice
  5. R. Dav'e
  6. Volker Springel
  7. Simon D. M. White
  8. A. Dekel

Citations in the corpus