Bulge mass is king: the dominant role of the bulge in determining the fraction of passive galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

By A. Bluck, J. Trevor Mendel, Sara L. Ellison, J. Moreno, L. Simard, David R. Patton, E. Starkenburg. 2014

192 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We investigate the origin of galaxy bimodality by quantifying the relative role of intrinsic and environmental drivers to the cessation (or `quenching') of star formation in over half a million local Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) galaxies. Our sample contains a wide variety of galaxies at z=0.02-0.2, with stellar masses of 8 < log(M*/M_sun) < 12, spanning the entire morphological range from pure disks to spheroids, and over four orders of magnitude in local galaxy density and halo mass. We utilise published star formation rates and add to this recent GIM2D photometric and stellar mass bulge + disk decompositions from our group. We find that the passive fraction of galaxies increases steeply with stellar mass, halo mass, and bulge mass, with a less steep dependence on local galaxy density and bulge-to-total stellar mass ratio (B/T). At fixed internal properties, we find that central and satellite galaxies have different passive fraction relationships. For centrals, we conclude that there is less variation in the passive fraction at a fixed bulge mass, than for any other variable, including total stellar mass, halo mass, and B/T. This implies that the quenching mechanism must be most tightly coupled to the bulge. We argue that radio-mode AGN feedback offers the most plausible explanation of the observed trends.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aaa0992a3316b100aff5733946add9fb0880c3f5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. R. Somerville
  3. A. Dekel
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. R. Dav'e
  6. P. V. van Dokkum
  7. Joel R. Primack
  8. S. Wuyts

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. R. Somerville
  2. R. Skelton
  3. R. Genzel
  4. N. F. Förster Schreiber
  5. Tianyu Liu
  6. Joel R. Primack
  7. P. V. van Dokkum
  8. H. Ferguson

In Instrumentation

  1. A. Dekel
  2. R. Somerville
  3. P. Hopkins
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. R. Dav'e
  6. P. V. van Dokkum
  7. Joel R. Primack
  8. S. Wuyts

Citations in the corpus