Ego Identity Status, Identity Style, and Personal Expressiveness

By Seth J. Schwartz, R. Mullis, A. Waterman, R. M. Dunham. 2000

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e3d0d7a6f8bfc86ecf80d1e477a8d121a99ae274

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. M. Berzonsky
2. A. Waterman
3. Mohsen Joshanloo
4. P. Wong

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. M. Berzonsky
2. A. Waterman
3. Seth J. Schwartz
4. K. Luyckx
5. W. Meeus
6. Bart Soenens
7. Susan J T Branje
8. Luc Goossens

In Sociology and Political Science

1. M. Berzonsky
2. A. Waterman
3. Seth J. Schwartz
4. W. Meeus
5. Susan J T Branje

Citations in the corpus

• Eudaimonic Identity Theory: Identity as Self-Discovery (2011, methodology): “It follows that functioning in the foreclosure status will provide a less substantial foundation for well-being than will functioning in the identity achievement status (Hofer, Kartner, Chasiotis, Busch, & Kiessling, 2007; Schwartz, Mullis, Waterman, & Dunham, 2000; Waterman, 2007).”
• A Social-Cognitive Perspective on Identity Construction (2011, background): “Identity foreclosure—firm commitment with limited self-exploration—is associated with a normative style, identity diffusion is associated with a diffuse-avoidant style, and identity achievement and moratorium are linked with an informational identity style (Berman, Schwartz, Kurtines, & Berman, 2001”