Anger amongst New Zealand drivers

By M. Sullman. 2006

132 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e3ace1b83516f06491a838a2340d4274f55a5434

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. Sullman Mjm
2. M. Sullman
3. Yongjuan Li
4. Li Jiang
5. Feng Li
6. Xiang Yao

In Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

1. Sullman Mjm
2. M. Sullman
3. Yongjuan Li
4. Li Jiang
5. Feng Li
6. Xiang Yao

In Social Psychology

1. Sullman Mjm
2. M. Sullman
3. Yongjuan Li
4. Li Jiang
5. Feng Li
6. Xiang Yao
7. Nachshon Meiran

Citations in the corpus

• Social desirability and self-reported driving behaviours: Should we be worried? (2010, unknown): “…and surveys are extensively used in research on driving behaviour (e.g., Lajunen & Summala, 2003; Reason, Manstead, Stradling, Baxter, & Campbell, 1990; Strahan, Watson, & Lennonb, 2008; Sullman, 2006; Sullman & Mann, 2009; Wallén, Warner, & Åberg, 2008; S ims ekoğlu & Lajunen, 2008).”
• Driving anger in China: Psychometric properties of the Driving Anger Scale (DAS) and its relationship with aggressive driving (2014, methodology): “Compared to New Zealander (Sullman, 2006) and Spanish samples (Sullman et al.”
• The expression of anger on the road (2015, background): “As research has shown the level of driving anger differs between countries, as does the level of anger evoked by different types of situations (e.g. Deffenbacher et al., 1994; Lajunen et al., 1998; Sullman, 2006; Sullman et al., 2007), it is important to study additional countries.”
• Situational (state) anger and driving (2012, background): “On the basis of the ‘‘Driving Anger Scale’’ (Deffenbacher, Oetting, & Lynch, 1994), Sullman (2006) defines four main categories of driving-related anger provoking situations: progress impeded, risky driving, hostile gestures, and discourteous driving.”
• Driving anger in Spain (2007, methodology): “The 33-item version of the DAS has been used to measure driving anger amongst drivers from the USA (Deffenbacher et al., 1994), UK (Lajunen, Parker, & Stradling, 1998), and New Zealand (Sullman, 2006a).”