Pricing Nature, Cost--Benefit Analysis and Environmental Policy

By Ing-Marie Gren. 2010

318 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e3a830dbc608abc3fe7dbf582e4b5143a4e5db35

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Can nature-based tourism benefits compensate for the costs of national parks? A study of the Bavarian Forest National Park, Germany (2014, background): “The decision rule postulates that a project should be continued, if it provides a NPV > 0 or a benefit–cost ratio (BCR)>1 (Hanley & Barbier, 2009).”
Measuring the economic value of pollination services: principles, evidence and knowledge gaps. (2015, background): “, 2002), and, more importantly, are unlikely to accurately estimate the real value of a beneficial ecosystem service, due to issues of substitutability, joint products and the need for the least-cost alternative to be considered when such costs are calculated (Hanley and Barbier, 2009).”
Tools and methods in participatory modeling: Selecting the right tool for the job (2018, methodology): “Cost-benefit (or Benefit-cost) analysis (CBA) (e.g. Hanley and Barbier, 2009; NASA, 2013) is a commonly used methodology for assessing the anticipated costs and benefits of an investment or policy change compared to those that would accrue without an investment or policy change.”
Green economy and related concepts: An overview (2016, unknown): “Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is a decision support tool used to assess the welfare effects of a project or an investment and has its roots in the welfare measures of producer and consumer surplus (Hanley and Barbier, 2009; Hanley and Spash, 1993; Hansjürgens, 2004; Sen, 2000).”
Non‐Market Valuation: Usage and Impacts in Environmental Policy and Management in Australia (2015, unknown): “In the academic literature, the role of environmental valuation as a component within benefit- cost analysis (BCA) is acknowledged (e.g. Turner 2007; Pearce and Seccombe-Hett 2000), and this justification for the deployment of NMV studies is routinely raised (e.g. Hanley and Barbier 2009).”
From growth to green growth. (2011, unknown): “Bolt et al. (2005), Hanley and Barbier (2009), Pagiola et al. (2009) provide reviews of the various methodologies to infer the economic value of environmental goods and services that are not traded in actual markets.”
Twenty thousand sterling under the sea : Estimating the value of protecting deep-sea biodiversity (2014, methodology): “The 158 method allows us to infer which attributes are most important for people’s choices, estimate WTP for 159 changes in attributes (i.e. marginal values), and predict WTP for future scenarios with different 160 bundles of attributes (i.e. total value) (Hanley & Barbier, 2009).”
The economic benefits of invasive species management (2019, background): “Non-market valuation methods are usually categorised into 3 types (Hanley & Barbier, 2009): - Stated preference approaches - Revealed preference approaches - Production function methods All are based on the notion of maximum willingness to pay (WTP) as a standard measure of the economic value of a…”
Recent advances in the valuation of ecosystem services and biodiversity (2012, methodology): “There are many comprehensive reviews of economic valuation methods more generally (e.g. Champ et al., 2003; Freeman, 2003; Pearce et al., 2006; Hanley and Barbier, 2009).”