The Mediating Role of Appearance Comparisons in the Relationship Between Media Usage and Self-Objectification in Young Women

By Jasmine Fardouly, P. Diedrichs, Lenny R. Vartanian, Emma Halliwell. 2015

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The media’s portrayal of women is often sexually objectifying, and greater exposure to objectifying media is associated with higher levels of self-objectification among young women. One reason why media usage may be associated with self-objectification is because women may be comparing their appearance to others in the media. The present study examined (a) the relationship between the usage of different media types (online social media [Facebook], Internet, television, music videos, and magazines) and self-objectification among young women, (b) whether appearance comparison tendencies in general mediated any observed relationships, and (c) whether appearance comparisons to specific types of women on Facebook (self, family, close friends, distant peers, and celebrities) mediated any relationship between Facebook usage and self-objectification. Female participants (N = 150) aged 17–25 years completed questionnaires about their media usage, appearance comparison tendency in general, appearance comparisons to specific target groups on Facebook, and self-objectification. Results showed that Facebook usage and magazine usage were positively correlated with self-objectification and that these relationships were mediated by appearance comparisons in general. In addition, the relationship between Facebook usage and self-objectification was mediated by comparisons to one’s peers on Facebook. These findings suggest that appearance comparisons can play an important role in self-objectification among young women.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/98c358b493201a794c6b9e4fd94a61f06301551c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

  1. Chandra E. Feltman
  2. Dawn M. Szymanski
  3. Tiffany Melioli
  4. Jasmine Fardouly
  5. Lenny R. Vartanian
  6. Brydie K. Willburger
  7. Rachel Florence Rodgers
  8. Hyosun Kim

In Gender Studies

  1. Chandra E. Feltman
  2. Dawn M. Szymanski
  3. Tiffany Melioli
  4. Lenny R. Vartanian
  5. Rachel Florence Rodgers
  6. Jasmine Fardouly
  7. Gina P. Owens
  8. Susan Kashubeck‐West

Citations in the corpus