Evaluating Plant Breeding Strategies by Simulating Gene Action and Dryland Environment Effects

By Scott C. Chapman, Mark Cooper, Dean W. Podlich, Graeme L. Hammer. Agronomy Journal, 2003

221 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Functional genomics is the systematic study of genome-wide effects of gene expression on organism growth and development with the ultimate aim of understanding how networks of genes influence traits. Here, we use a dynamic biophysical cropping systems model (APSIM-- Sorg) to generate a state space of genotype performance based on 15 genes controlling four adaptive traits and then search this space using a quantitative genetics model of a plant breeding program (QU-- GENE) to simulate recurrent selection. Complex epistatic and gene x environment effects were generated for yield even though gene action at the trait level had been defined as simple additive effects. Given alternative breeding strategies that restricted either the cultivar maturity type or the drought environment type, the positive (+) alleles for 15 genes associated with the four adaptive traits were accumulated at different rates over cycles of selection. While early maturing genotypes were favored in the Severe-Terminal drought environment type, late genotypes were favored in the Mild-Terminal and Midseason drought environment types. In the Severe-Terminal environment, there was an interaction of the stay-green (SG) trait with other traits: Selection for + alleles of the SG genes was delayed until + alleles for genes associated with the transpiration efficiency and osmotic adjustment traits had been fixed. Given limitations in our current understanding of trait interaction and genetic control, the results are not conclusive. However, they demonstrate how the per se complexity of gene x gene x environment interactions will challenge the application of genomics and marker-assisted selection in crop improvement for dryland adaptation.

Subfields: Genetics, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e32f750deb61d6dc1d2fc9b32fe6194faae5fbad

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

  1. Scott C. Chapman
  2. Karine Chenu
  3. Mark Cooper
  4. Graeme L. Hammer
  5. G. Edmeades
  6. Fred van Eeuwijk
  7. M. Malosetti
  8. J. Schussler

In Plant Science

  1. Scott C. Chapman
  2. Mark Cooper
  3. Graeme L. Hammer
  4. Karine Chenu
  5. G. Edmeades
  6. Erik J. van Oosterom
  7. J. Schussler
  8. Fred van Eeuwijk

Citations in the corpus