Crop design for specific adaptation in variable dryland production environments
By Graeme L. Hammer, Greg McLean, Scott C. Chapman, Bangyou Zheng, A. Doherty, M. Harrison, E. V. van Oosterom, David R. Jordan. Crop and Pasture Science, 2014
155 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract. Climatic variability in dryland production environments (E) generates variable yield and crop production risks. Optimal combinations of genotype (G) and management (M) depend strongly on E and thus vary among sites and seasons. Traditional crop improvement seeks broadly adapted genotypes to give best average performance under a standard management regime across the entire production region, with some subsequent manipulation of management regionally in response to average local environmental conditions. This process does not search the full spectrum of potential G × M × E combinations forming the adaptation landscape. Here we examine the potential value (relative to the conventional, broad adaptation approach) of exploiting specific adaptation arising from G × M × E. We present an in-silico analysis for sorghum production in Australia using the APSIM sorghum model. Crop design (G × M) is optimised for subsets of locations within the production region (specific adaptation) and is compared with the optimum G across all environments with locally modified M (broad adaptation). We find that geographic subregions that have frequencies of major environment types substantially different from that for the entire production region show greatest advantage for specific adaptation. Although the specific adaptation approach confers yield and production risk advantages at industry scale, even greater benefits should be achievable with better predictors of environment-type likelihood than that conferred by location alone.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7d1c41c929d60dc6f7f40750cc359fe68168c18f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- James R. Hunt
- Zvi Hochman
- Scott C. Chapman
- Daniel Rodríguez
- V. Sadras
- Mark Cooper
- Enli Wang
- M. Unkovich
In Genetics
- Scott C. Chapman
- Karine Chenu
- Mark Cooper
- Graeme L. Hammer
- J. Schussler
- C. Messina
- V. Sadras
- Erik J. van Oosterom
In Plant Science
- Scott C. Chapman
- Mark Cooper
- V. Sadras
- Graeme L. Hammer
- Karine Chenu
- C. Messina
- Erik J. van Oosterom
- J. Schussler
Citations in the corpus
- Interactions between water and nitrogen in Australian cropping systems: physiological, agronomic, economic, breeding and modelling perspectives (2016, background): “Owing to variation in hybrids, environments and agronomic options, there is an opportunity for the improvement of sorghum yield by developing specific genotype environment management (G E M) combinations (Hammer et al. 2014).”
- Industry-Scale Evaluation of Maize Hybrids Selected for Increased Yield in Drought-Stress Conditions of the US Corn Belt (2015, methodology): “The degree of water deficit was quantified using the water supply/demand ratio methodology introduced by Muchow et al. (1996) and used by Chapman et al. (2000), Chenu et al. (2011), Hammer et al. (2014) and Harrison et al. (2014).”
- APSIM - Evolution towards a new generation of agricultural systems simulation (2014, background): “This enables large scale, gridded applications to be developed (Elliot et al., 2014; Hammer et al., 2014; Zhao et al., 2013a) at the regional, country, continental and global scale.”