Evolutionary consequences of autopolyploidy.

By Christian Parisod, R. Holderegger, C. Brochmann. New Phytologist, 2010

652 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e306772fe769a40a3f3aeb98a330a669bf32c281

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

StAMPP: an R package for calculation of genetic differentiation and structure of mixed‐ploidy level populations (2013, background): “…have experienced a polyploidization event at some point in their ancestry (Wood et al. 2009), and a large fraction of plant species are still existent as polyploid cytotypes (Leitch & Bennett 1997) or co-exist as diploid and auto-polyploid cytotypes (Goldblatt & Johnson 1979; Parisod et al. 2010).”
Polyploidy, the Nucleotype, and Novelty: The Impact of Genome Doubling on the Biology of the Cell (2019, background): “…as the success of polyploids relative to diploids (e.g., Mayrose et al. 2011; Soltis et al. 2014a; Kellogg 2016; Van de Peer et al. 2017; Landis et al. 2018) and of autopolyploids relative to allopolyploids (Soltis et al. 2007; Parisod et al. 2010; Barker et al. 2016a) continue to be debated today.”
Achievements and Challenges in Improving Temperate Perennial Forage Legumes (2015, background): “Indeed, autotetraploidy is a positive trait to widen the species environmental adaptation, because it offers to plants the capacity to host a large number of mutations (Parisod et al., 2010) and conserve several alleles that generate homeostasis under stressed conditions (Gallais, 2003).”
Genome duplication in amphibians and fish: an extended synthesis (2011, background): “…not always a reliable estimate of WGD. Genome sequencing studies have confirmed that transposable elements (which can result in large differences in genome sizes without changes in chromosome numbers) may confound relationships between DNA content and chromosome numbers (e.g. Parisod et al., 2010).”
Mitotic chromosome doubling of plant tissues in vitro (2010, background): “Examples are loss of duplicated genes, gene expression alterations and epigenetic changes modulating gene expression as reviewed by Osborn et al. (2003), Otto (2007) and Parisod et al. (2010).”
Pure polyploidy: Closing the gaps in autopolyploid research (2017, background): “However, more recent investigations of meiosis in many auto- and allopolyploid species have shown that aberrant meiosis, particularly multivalent pairing, affects both auto- and allopolyploids during the neopolyploid stage (Parisod et al., 2010b; Zhang et al., 2013; Lloyd & Bomblies, 2016).”
The “Polyploid Hop”: Shifting Challenges and Opportunities Over the Evolutionary Lifespan of Genome Duplications (2018, background): “Despite this prevalence, however, WGD is no easy victory: the presence of an extra set of chromosomes creates numerous biological challenges ranging from chromosome mis-segregation to altered gene expression, changes in cell size or in intracellular physiology (Ramsey and Schemske, 2002; Osborn et a”
Homoeologs: What Are They and How Do We Infer Them? (2016, background): “Hybridization can induce a ‘genome shock’ prompting epigenetic or expression changes that might not be present with strictly genome doubling per se [8,28–30].”
The more the better? The role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasions. (2012, background): “Mechanisms involved in auto- and allopolyploidization have been thoroughly covered in several recent reviews (e.g. Osborn et al., 2003; Adams and Wendel, 2005b; Brysting et al., 2007; Hegarty and Hiscock, 2007; Chen, 2010; Parisod et al., 2010).”