Dating buried sediments using radioactive decay and muogenic production of 26Al and 10Be

By D. Granger, A.L. Smith. 2000

200 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Production rate calculations for cosmic-ray-muon-produced 10Be and 26Al benchmarked against geological calibration data (2017, methodology): “Figure 14 shows an example that uses a sum of two expo- 871 nential functions; other examples include Granger and Smith (2000) and Balco et al. 872 (2011a), who used sums of three exponential functions to approximate muon produc- 873 tion rates at specific sites.”
A geologically constrained Monte Carlo approach to modeling exposure ages from profiles of cosmogenic nuclides: An example from Lees Ferry, Arizona (2010, background): “…simple exponential function with depth as described by equation (1) [Heisinger et al., 2002a, 2002b], it has been shown that reasonable approximations to muon production can be made with multiple exponential terms for muon production pathways [e.g., Granger and Smith, 2000; Schaller et al., 2002].”
Dating sediment burial with in situ-produced cosmogenic nuclides: theory, techniques, and limitations (2001, background): “More recently, Granger and Smith [10] have dated 1.”
CosmoCalc: An Excel add‐in for cosmogenic nuclide calculations (2007, methodology): “The approach of Granger and Smith [2000] and Granger et al. [2001] was chosen because of its flexibility.”