Dating sediment burial with in situ-produced cosmogenic nuclides: theory, techniques, and limitations

By D. Granger, P. Muzikar. 2001

495 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Molecular Biology, Paleontology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab08f8ea95eda5f877d07d4c8e0d3f67d253b300

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. B. Cardinale

In Molecular Biology

1. J. Wright
2. B. Cardinale

In Paleontology

1. B. Cardinale

Citations in the corpus

• Dynamic interactions of life and its landscape: feedbacks at the interface of geomorphology and ecology (2010, background): “Radioactive cosmogenic nuclides (10Be and 26Al, 36Cl) can determine the age of sedimentary deposits up to 5 Myrs old (Granger and Muzikar, 2001), while stable nuclides such as 3He and 21Ne can be used to date multimillion year old bedrock surfaces (Schafer et al., 1999).”
• An approach for optimizing in SITU cosmogenic 10BE sample preparation (2016, background): “Increasing the precision of analyses enhances not only the interpretations that can be made from dates and rates, but also enables approaches involving multiple isotopic systems such as burial dating (Granger and Muzikar, 2001) and isochron burial dating (Balco and Rovey, 2008), and allows for impro”