Reliability Methods: A Note on the Frequency of Use of Various Types
By T. Hogan, A. Benjamin, Kristen L. Brezinski. 2000
266 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e2e48a102a2e874c30dc3f716bf266d65426d5aa
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Yanyun Yang
- T. Vacha-haase
- S. Green
- B. Thompson
- Eunseong Cho
- Thomas J. Dunn
- Vivienne Brunsden
- T. Baguley
In Statistics and Probability
- T. Vacha-haase
- Yanyun Yang
- B. Thompson
- S. Green
- T. Baguley
- Thomas J. Dunn
- Vivienne Brunsden
- Robert A. Terry
Citations in the corpus
- Parenting Stress of Low-Income Parents of Toddlers and Preschoolers: Psychometric Properties of a Short Form of the Parenting Stress Index (2007, background): “Althoughα( Cronbach, 1951 )isthe most frequently used estimate of reliability for composite measures, it has known limitations ( Hogan, Benjamin, & Brezinski, 2000 ).”
- A Note on Structural Equation Modeling Estimates of Reliability (2010, background): “In psychology and education, reliability is estimated most frequently by assessing covariability among parts (eg, items) of a scale and, more specifically, by computing coefficient alpha ( Hogan, Benjamin, & Brezinski, 2000 ).”
- Score Reliability: A Retrospective Look Back at 12 Years of Reliability Generalization Studies (2011, methodology): “Twelve years ago, in a seminal article, VachaHaase (1998) proposed RG as an extension of another measurement meta-analytic method, Validity Generalization, which was developed by Schmidt and Hunter (1977) and Hunter and Schmidt (1990). Vacha-Haase (1998) described RG as a method to characterize empi”
- From alpha to omega: a practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. (2014, background): “These accounted for 75% of all reported reliabilities (Hogan et al., 2000).”
- Impact of the Number of Response Categories and Anchor Labels on Coefficient Alpha and Test-Retest Reliability (2004, methodology): “Hogan, Benjamin, and Brezinski (2000) found that coefficient α was used in over two thirds of the tests they reviewed, and fewer than 20% of the tests reported test-retest reliability.”
- The Assessment of Reliability Under Range Restriction (2012, methodology): “%) falling between .7 and .94 (Hogan et al., 2000).”