Gray’s impulsivity dimension: A distinction between Reward Sensitivity versus Rash Impulsiveness

By Ingmar H. A. Franken, P. Muris. 2006

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e2cb750877c6ae6b894ee27d79ec9ecaa9074eed

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. T. Judge
2. Jeffrey LePine
3. J. Bono
4. Arnold B. Bakker
5. Fred Luthans
6. R. Ilies
7. N. Guenole
8. N. Bowling

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. T. Judge
2. Hee-Yeon Jung
3. Su Mi Park
4. Y. Park
5. Jung-Seok Choi
6. Jun-Young Lee
7. Haewoo Lee
8. Sabine Sonnentag

Citations in the corpus

• The effects of behavioral inhibition/approach system as predictors of Internet addiction in adolescents (2013, background): “…(1991,1993) Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) which provides the basis for human motivation and action postulating two basic and independent biologically-based dimensions of motivation and personality (e.g. Franken & Muris, 2006a; Franken & Muris, 2006b; Franken, Muris, & Georgieva, 2006).”
• Psychometric evaluation of the behavioral inhibition/behavioral activation system scales and the sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward questionnaire in a sample of eating disordered patients (2009, unknown): “The Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ; Franken & Muris, 2006; Torrubia et al., 2001) consists of 48 items with a yes/no response format divided into two subscales, Sensitivity to Punishment (SP; a = 0.84) and Sensitivity to Reward (SR; a = 0.70).”
• The Bright and Dark Sides of Personality: Implications for Personnel Selection in Individual and Team Contexts (2007, background): “are inclined toward novelty-seeking behavior (Franken and Muris, 2006), which one”