Born gay? The psychobiology of human sexual orientation
152 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Molecular Biology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e2c8b9650abfe7c0f88f555cfb122b29cefd608f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Molecular Biology
In Social Psychology
- L. Mayers
- Eric P. Windell
- J. Veale
- Phillip L. Hammack
- A. Bogaert
- Jacquelyn W. White
- B. Cohler
- A. Pilecki
Citations in the corpus
- Edinburgh Handedness Inventory – Short Form: A revised version based on confirmatory factor analysis (2014, background): “These groups are more likely to be non- right-handed (for reviews see Rahman & Wilson, 2003; Veale, Clarke, & Lomax, 2010b).”
- Toward a Conceptual Understanding of Asexuality (2006, background): “…fair degree of support marshalled in favor of biological factors in the development of sexual orientation (e.g., Mustanski, Chivers, & Bailey, 2002; Rahman & Wilson, 2003), but even strong advocates of this position argue that sexual orientation development is complex and that multiple factors and…”
- The Life Course Development of Human Sexual Orientation: An Integrative Paradigm (2005, background): “…converging evidence to suggest that biology plays some role in the development of same-sex sex- 278 Human Development 2005;48:267–290 Hammack ual desire and the assumption of a gay or lesbian identity, despite a wide range of individual differences [for a review, see Rahman & Wilson, 2003].”
- Genetic factors predisposing to homosexuality may increase mating success in heterosexuals (2008, unknown): “Numerous theoretical explanations have been proposed for this “Darwinian paradox,” many of which are critically reviewed in Rahman and Wilson (2003).”
- Narrative, psychology and the politics of sexual identity in the United States: from ‘sickness’ to ‘species’ to ‘subject’ (2013, background): “This decade witnessed the emergence of several lines of enquiry in the biological sciences, but also within psychology, that argued for the significance of neurological, hormonal and genetic factors in the development of sexual orientation (for review, see Mustanski, Chivers, & Bailey, 2002 ; Rahma”
- An Integrative Paradigm (2005, background): “…converging evidence to suggest that biology plays some role in the development of same-sex sex- 278 Human Development 2005;48:267–290 Hammack ual desire and the assumption of a gay or lesbian identity, despite a wide range of individual differences [for a review, see Rahman & Wilson, 2003].”