Corporate governance structure and firm performance in developing economies: evidence from Nigeria

By B. Ehikioya. 2009

451 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e2c4d3fe16923ee01e990e241176c8998f9a378d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

Citations in the corpus

Do board characteristics drive firm performance? An international perspective (2019, background): “…relation is obtained by Kota and Tomar (2010) for companies in India, and Elsayed (2007) in Egypt, a negative relation was found for Nigeria (Ehikioya 2009) and Russia (Judge et al.) and no relation was obtained by Baliga and Moyer (1996) for the United States or Lin et al. (2009) for China.”
Corporate governance and firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence from Turkey (2019, methodology): “…and Garcia-Lacalle (2014); Nguyen et al. (2014); Zakaria et al. (2014); Veprauskaite and Adams (2013); Agrawal and Knoeber (2012); Guest (2009); Ehikioya (2009); Jackling and Johl (2009); Singh and Gaur (2009); Setia-Atmaja (2009); Perrini et al. (2008); Campbell and Minguez-Vera (2008); Mura…”
State ownership and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies (2013, unknown): “A firm’s assets or employee numbers have been widely used in the literature to measure firm size, as in studies by Judge et al. (2003), Dahya and McConnell (2007), Ehikioya (2009), Faleye (2007) and Elsayed (2007).”
Effect of Board Size and Duality on Corporate Social Responsibility: What has Improved in Corporate Governance in Asia? (2019, background): “Ehikioya (2009) mentioned that recent financial disturbance in Asia in the late 1990s with several scandals in Enron, World Com and other related firms has again encouraged investors, policy makers, and other stakeholders to take interest towards good CG.”
Corporate governance and firms financial performance in the United Kingdom (2020, methodology): “d firms because they are expected to adhere to set regulation standards. In addition, listed firms are likely to prepare their accounting figures in compliance with international accounting practice (Ehikioya, 2009). We stress that we excluded financial institutions because they are subjects to diff”
Effect of board size and promoter ownership on firm value: some empirical findings from India (2013, background): “Various researchers (Ehikioya, 2009; Coles et al., 2008; Dwivedi and Jain, 2005; Klein, 2002; Dalton et al., 1999; Kathuria and Dash, 1999; Pearce and Zahra, 1992) document a positive relationship of board size with the firm value.”
Board characteristics and company performance: Evidence from Nigeria (2014, background): “In Nigeria, studies like Sanda, Mukailu, and Garba (2005), Ehikioya (2009), Babatunde and Olaniran (2009), Kajola (2010), and Akhalumeh, Ohiokho, Ohiokha (2011) have studied corporate governance and firm performance, but did not consider the elements of gender, age and educational qualification.”
The effects of corporate governance on financial performance and financial distress: evidence from Egypt (2015, methodology): “Previous studies (Elsayed, 2007; Ehikioya, 2009) find that a larger blockholder ownership has a positive impact on firm performance.”
The Measurements of Firm Performance's Dimensions (2014, background): “Price-Ear nings Ratio (PE) Valenti, Luce and Mayfield (2011), Ehikioya (2009), Sanda, Mikailu and Garba (2005).”