The Rationality Quotient: Toward a Test of Rational Thinking

2016

201 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e2998a76d43ea6c59e5332f7c1a5f0437ff647a2

Citations in the corpus

• Reflections on reflection: the nature and function of type 2 processes in dual-process theories of reasoning (2019, unknown): “…in rational thinking style as a determinant of whether sufficient Type 2 processing effort is made, proposing that IQ tests are inadequate measures of rational thinking because they currently omit to measure individual differences in thinking style (Stanovich, 2009a; Stanovich et al., 2016).”
• An examination of the underlying dimensional structure of three domains of contaminated mindware: paranormal beliefs, conspiracy beliefs, and anti-science attitudes (2020, unknown): “These results are consistent with and extend previous research examining associations between those individual differences and unwarranted beliefs (e.g., Lindeman et al., 2015; Lobato et al., 2014; Pennycook et al., 2015a; Stanovich et al., 2016; Swami et al, 2014).”
• Unsolved Problems in ML Safety (2021, unknown): “Many human values, such as happiness [116], good judgment [167], meaningful experiences [52], human autonomy, and so on, are hard to define and measure.”
• Assessment of University Students’ Critical Thinking: Next Generation Performance Assessment (2019, unknown): “Since Tversky and Kahneman's initial research, the list of judgmental and decision making heuristics has exploded (e.g., Stanovich, 2016) and can be easily researched on the internet.”