Plant functional trait responses to grassland succession over 25 years

By S. Kahmen, Peter Poschlod. 2004

226 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Forestry, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e29511633f563296a39d469910ec18897771574d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Forestry

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Indicators of biodiversity and ecosystem services: a synthesis across ecosystems and spatial scales (2009, background): “Traits are frequently used to assess the impact of different management schemes, such as fire, grazing and mowing in grassland ecosystems (Kahmen and Poschlod 2004, Dı́az et al. 2007b, Quétier et al. 2007), forest ecosystems (Graae and Sunde 2000, Myking 2002) and agro-ecosystems (Döring and…”
Plant functional group composition and large-scale species richness in European agricultural landscapes (2008, background): “…or anthropogenic factors, the ad hoc groups are deemed to be most promising in addressing the variation of general plant communities, i.e. at landscape or global scales (Noble & Gitay 1996; Díaz & Cabido 1997; Grime et al. 1997; Díaz et al. 2004; Hunt et al. 2004; Kahmen & Poschlod 2004).”
Contrasting changes in taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity during a long‐term succession: insights into assembly processes (2013, background): “…studies of plant community assembly during succession have mainly focussed on temporal changes in taxonomic (species) composition, on changes in single traits or on changes in functional groups (Noble & Slayter 1980; Prach, Py sek & Smilauer 1997; Garnier et al. 2004; Kahmen & Poschlod 2004).”
Assessing the effects of land-use change on plant traits, communities and ecosystem functioning in grasslands: a standardized methodology and lessons from an application to 11 European sites. (2007, background): “More generally, these variations in OFL can be interpreted as a change from ruderal to competitive strategies (cf. Grime, 2001; Kahmen and Poschold, 2004; Pakeman, 2004), in line with the fact that large plants tend to flower late.”
The state of plant population modelling in light of environmental change (2008, background): “However, such data sets are relatively rare and often difficult to decipher with regard to underlying mechanisms (e.g. Kahmen and Poschlod, 2004; Silvertown et al., 2006).”
Relative climatic, edaphic and management controls of plant functional trait signatures (2009, background): “…resource-retentive life histories (e.g. evergreen leaves, high leaf dry matter content), whereas disturbed plots were more associated with acquisitive life histories (e.g. high leaf nitrogen content (Garnier et al. 2004; Kahmen & Poschlod 2004; Pakeman 2004; Louault et al. 2005; Vile et al. 2006).”
Synthesis and future research directions linking tree diversity to growth, survival, and damage in a global network of tree diversity experiments (2018, background): “following disturbance or planting, secondary succession takes place through species turnover and both biotic and abiotic modification of the soil over the course of decades (25–75 years; Reynolds et al., 2003; Kahmen and Poschlod, 2004; McLauchlan et al., 2006).”
Species divergence and trait convergence in experimental plant community assembly (2005, background): “However, circumstantial evidence suggests that our findings are likely to be general across a variety of habitats and taxa (e.g. Diamond 1975; Fox 1987; Berlow 1997; Wilson 1999; Fargione et al. 2003; Gillespie 2004; Kahmen & Poschlod 2004).”
How important is long‐distance seed dispersal for the regional survival of plant species? (2005, background): “Empirical studies have related basic plant traits such as seed mass to species distributions and changes in distributions (Thompson, 1994; Thompson et al., 1999; Kahmen & Poschlod, 2004; Ozinga et al., 2005).”