Species divergence and trait convergence in experimental plant community assembly

By T. Fukami, T. Martijn, Bezemer, S. Mortimer, W. H. van der Putten. 2005

699 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/71c311049744e43bb77fea2daf0b93c2faa2167c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Plant traits related to competition: how do they shape the functional diversity of communities? (2009, background): “Despite a major influence of biotic interactions, especially plant-plant interactions, on community assembly (Fukami et al. 2005, Ejrnaes et al. 2006, Grime 2006), their influence on FD has not been considered yet, probably because there is no agreement concerning the traits related to competition…”
Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. (2006, background): “Although being interested in the role of traits in ecology is not new [15], community ecologists have preferred to emphasize a nomenclatural approach by focusing on species identities, which has resulted in a loss of ecological generality [ 16 ].”
Transient phenomena in ecology (2018, background): “in the Netherlands (57) Long-term existence of a large number of alternative”
Trait-Based Approaches in the Analysis of Stream Fish Communities (2010, background): “This is a fast-growing topic in plant community ecology (e.g., Fukami et al. 2005; Ackerly and Cornwell 2007; Kraft et al. 2007), but examples in stream fish community ecology are lacking (but see Cook et al. 2004; Eros et al. 2009).”
Ecological assembly rules in plant communities—approaches, patterns and prospects (2012, methodology): “Up to now, there has been surprisingly little use of species removal and addition experiments, explicitly to study assembly rules (Fukami et al., 2005; Turnbull et al., 2005; Ejrnaes, Bruun & Graae, 2006; Mwangi et al., 2007; Myers & Harms, 2009a; Roscher, Schmid & Schulze, 2009; McLaren &…”
Agriculture and biodiversity conservation: opportunity knocks (2008, background): “…have been particularly productive in this respect, providing insights into biodiversity and ecosystem function (Tilman et al. 2001; Tilman et al. 2006), community assembly (Fukami et al. 2005), and a mechanistic understanding of the impact of management on biodiversity (Harpole & Tilman 2007).”
Using priority effects to manipulate competitive relationships in restoration (2017, background): “Fukami et al. (2005) underscore the potential advantage ofmonitoring traits rather than simply species composition, and show that historical contingencymay lead to divergent community structure, but longer-term convergence in function (guild structure), which in some cases may be the goal for…”
A functional analysis of large‐scale temporal shifts from 1970 to 2000 in weed assemblages of sunflower crops in France (2009, methodology): “To test the robustness of the Ward ascendant hierarchy, we used K-means (Legendre & Legendre 1998) as an alternative method of non-hierarchical clustering, as suggested by Fukami et al. (2005).”
Stochastic Community Assembly: Does It Matter in Microbial Ecology? (2017, background): “Historical contingency can be caused solely by a priority effect (137), which is a phenomenon where early-arriving organisms have negative or positive impacts on late-arriving organisms (36, 72, 137, 139, 140) (Fig.”
Measuring biodiversity to explain community assembly: a unified approach (2011, background): “These studies focused, for example, on yeasts (Anderson, Lachance & Starmer, 2004), grasslands (Fukami et al., 2005; Mayfield et al., 2005), herb-layer plants (Gerhold et al.”
Rethinking Community Assembly through the Lens of Coexistence Theory (2012, background): “…studies of community composition (e.g., Rees et al. 2001, Suding et al. 2005, Suttle et al. 2007, HilleRisLambers et al. 2010) can be reanalyzed using contemporary coexistence theory, leading to important insights into community assembly (e.g., Fukami et al. 2005, Cadotte & Strauss 2011).”
Long-term effectiveness of sowing high and low diversity seed mixtures to enhance plant community development on ex-arable fields (2007, background): “Recent works suggest that changes in species trait composition during succession can be better predicted than species composition itself (Prach et al. 1997; Fukami et al. 2005).”