Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2.
By Thomas Bodenheimer, Edward H. Wagner, Kevin Grumbach. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 2002
2,417 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Epidemiology, General Health Professions
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e293338463b8e9dd286a64985fcab2c13647163a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
In Epidemiology
In General Health Professions
- Trisha Greenhalgh
- S. Greenfield
- Edward H. Wagner
- M. Hewitt
- D. Kodner
- E. Stovall
- P. Nilsen
- Norbert Steigenberger
Citations in the corpus
- Improving the quality of health care for chronic conditions (2004, background): “The group then revised and enlarged the CCM.”
- Adoption, non-adoption, and abandonment of a personal electronic health record: case study of HealthSpace (2010, background): “In Britain as in many other countries, the prevalence of long term conditions is increasing but the budget for providing services is falling in real terms.”
- Integrated care programmes for chronically ill patients: a review of systematic reviews. (2005, result): “This is in line with the theory of Wagner [23–28].”
- All together now: a conceptual exploration of integrated care. (2009, background): “Unlike narrow, medically-oriented disease management programs, the CCM recognizes the importance of building links outside the health system, since this is where much of the work of chronic care takes place (Bodenheimer et al. 2002a).”
- From cancer patient to cancer survivor : lost in transition (2006, background): “The chronic disease model has been implemented in primary care practices to improve care for individuals with diabetes, asthma, and congestive heart failure and has had some success in terms of improved outcome measures and reduced health care costs (Bodenheimer et al., 2002a,b).”