A Comprehensive Review on Current Advances in Peptide Drug Development and Design

By Andy Chi-Lung Lee, J. Harris, Kum Khanna, Ji-Hong Hong. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2019

564 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Protein–protein interactions (PPIs) execute many fundamental cellular functions and have served as prime drug targets over the last two decades. Interfering intracellular PPIs with small molecules has been extremely difficult for larger or flat binding sites, as antibodies cannot cross the cell membrane to reach such target sites. In recent years, peptides smaller size and balance of conformational rigidity and flexibility have made them promising candidates for targeting challenging binding interfaces with satisfactory binding affinity and specificity. Deciphering and characterizing peptide–protein recognition mechanisms is thus central for the invention of peptide-based strategies to interfere with endogenous protein interactions, or improvement of the binding affinity and specificity of existing approaches. Importantly, a variety of computation-aided rational designs for peptide therapeutics have been developed, which aim to deliver comprehensive docking for peptide–protein interaction interfaces. Over 60 peptides have been approved and administrated globally in clinics. Despite this, advances in various docking models are only on the merge of making their contribution to peptide drug development. In this review, we provide (i) a holistic overview of peptide drug development and the fundamental technologies utilized to date, and (ii) an updated review on key developments of computational modeling of peptide–protein interactions (PepPIs) with an aim to assist experimental biologists exploit suitable docking methods to advance peptide interfering strategies against PPIs.

Subfields: Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e28bf03727d51b23c5ccf54b353e50727567e118

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

  1. Björn Wallner
  2. Isak Johansson-Åkhe
  3. O. Schueler‐Furman
  4. Liam J. McGuffin
  5. Arne Elofsson
  6. Jeffrey J. Gray
  7. Erik Lindahl
  8. David Baker

In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

  1. O. Schueler‐Furman
  2. Isak Johansson-Åkhe
  3. Björn Wallner

Citations in the corpus