Planning, personality, and prediction: The role of future focus in optimistic time predictions☆

By R. Buehler, Dale W. Griffin. 2003

160 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e27c1a6428f404fc25d785a7ff5e161408d0db85

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Vicki G. Morwitz
2. Gülden Ülkümen
3. Manoj. T. Thomas

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Gülden Ülkümen

In General Decision Sciences

1. Vicki G. Morwitz
2. Gülden Ülkümen
3. Manoj. T. Thomas

Citations in the corpus

• Susceptibility to anchoring effects: How openness-to-experience influences responses to anchoring cues (2007, unknown): “…in numerical reliance (Bartels, 2006; McElroy & Seta, 2003; Peters, Vastfall, & Slovic, 2006; Simon, Fagley, & Halleran, 2004), ambiguity (Lauriola & Levin, 2001; Nowlis, Kahn, & Dhar, 2002), preference for actions or inactions (Baron & Ritov, 2004) and the optimistic bias (Buehler & Griffin, 2003).”
• Will I Spend More in 12 Months or a Year? The Effect of Ease of Estimation and Confidence on Budget Estimates (2008, background): “However, different temporal frames can lead to differences in judgments and decisions (Buehler and Griffin 2003; Chandran and Menon 2004; Gourville 1998; Read, Loewenstein, and Rabin 1999).”