The out-of-plane compressive behavior of metallic honeycombs

By F. Côté, V. Deshpande, Norman A. Fleck, A. G. Evans. 2004

279 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e27afa9d8d03207ffbfad43cbf46289e8da740d3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

1. Norman A. Fleck
2. V. Deshpande
3. H. Wadley
4. J. W. Hutchinson
5. Zhenyu Xue
6. D. Radford
7. A. G. Evans
8. Lorenzo Valdevit

In Mechanical Engineering

1. H. Wadley
2. Norman A. Fleck
3. V. Deshpande
4. J. W. Hutchinson
5. A. G. Evans
6. Zhenyu Xue
7. Lorenzo Valdevit
8. D. Radford

In Mechanics of Materials

1. Norman A. Fleck
2. V. Deshpande
3. H. Wadley
4. J. W. Hutchinson
5. A. G. Evans
6. D. Radford
7. Zhenyu Xue
8. Lorenzo Valdevit

Citations in the corpus

• The stiffness and strength of the gyroid lattice (2014, background): “Examples include foams, the octet truss, hollow truss, gyroid, Kagome and honeycomb (Deshpande et al., 2001b; Jacobsen et al., 2007; Queheillalt and Wadley, 2005; Fleck et al., 2010; Cote et al., 2004; Scherer et al., 2012).”
• Structural performance of near-optimal sandwich panels with corrugated cores (2006, background): “Cores of interest include honeycombs (Zok et al., in press; Cote et al., 2004), pyramidal and tetrahedral trusses (Chiras et al., 2002; Rathbun et al., 2004; Wicks and Hutchinson, 2004; Zok et al., 2004), textile meshes (Sypeck and Wadley, 2001; Zok et al., 2003) as well as corrugated and diamond…”
• Metal sandwich plates optimized for pressure impulses (2005, background): “The crushing strain of the core would be underestimated, possibly significantly so, because cores that buckle elastically are not nearly as effect in absorbing energy as those that yield plastically before buckling [ 14 ].”
• Crush dynamics of square honeycomb sandwich cores (2006, background): “Considerable effort has addressed the crushing behaviour of hexagonal honeycombs for applications where energy absorption is important [4–6].”
• A protocol for characterizing the structural performance of metallic sandwich panels: application to pyramidal truss cores (2004, background): “At the larger relative densities (qP 7%), strain hardening continues up to strains of order 20–30%, despite plastic buckling, because of the stubbiness of the truss members ( Cote et al., 2004; Hill, 1948).”
• Performance of metallic honeycomb-core sandwich beams under shock loading (2006, background): “To produce the core, an array of steel slotted strips was assembled in a wine-box configuration (Cote et al., 2004; Zok et al., in press).”
• Three-point bending of sandwich beams with aluminum foam-filled corrugated cores (2014, background): “9(a) and (b) compared separately the measured out-ofplane peak compressive strength rPeak 33 and specific energy absorption (SEA) Wm of foam-filled sandwich with several competing core designs, including empty corrugated cores, diamond cores [37], square-honeycomb cores [38] and pyramidal truss core”
• Compression behavior and energy absorption of 3D printed continuous fiber reinforced composite honeycomb structures with shape memory effects (2021, background): “10 compares the out-ofplane compression strength and out-of-plane SEA of the 3D printed CFRCHSs with other competitive cellular topologies including carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) hierarchical honeycomb [6], 3D printed PLA honeycomb [9], Aluminum (Al) foam filled CFRP tube [34], Al honeycomb”