Crush dynamics of square honeycomb sandwich cores

By Zhenyu Xue, J. W. Hutchinson. 2006

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Polymers and Plastics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3e9b048150645eeafe99afb5463606bb0eb3483d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

In Mechanical Engineering

In Polymers and Plastics

Citations in the corpus

Dynamic crushing and energy absorption of regular, irregular and functionally graded cellular structures (2011, background): “An important dimensionless parameter which governs the inertial effects is V ¼ V=ðc0eY Þ, where c0 = (E/q)0.5 is the elastic wave speed in the cell wall material, and eY = rY/E (Xue and Hutchinson, 2006).”
Mechanical response of metallic honeycomb sandwich panel structures to high-intensity dynamic loading (2008, background): “Recent studies indicate that a square honeycomb topology with the webs aligned perpendicular to the face sheets has the highest crush resistance [14].”
Protocols for the Optimal Design of Multi‐Functional Cellular Structures: From Hypersonics to Micro‐Architected Materials (2011, background): “26,141 The challenge is to deﬁne the constitutive behavior of the material in a way that a single solid element (possibly with size spanning several unit cells) elastically and plastically deforms consistently with buck-ling phenomena that are dominated by length scales of the order of the unit…”
Compressive response of multilayered pyramidal lattices during underwater shock loading (2008, background): “For a bi-linear material with linear hardening rate, Xue and Hutchinson have proposed a dynamic strength law of the form [25]:”
Response of metallic pyramidal lattice core sandwich panels to high intensity impulsive loading in air (2011, background): “The through thickness (vertical) forces transmitted to supports are governed by the dynamic strength of the core which in turn depends upon the core relative density, the inertial strengthening of its structural members, and the strength (modified by strain-rate hardening) of the material used for i”