Assessing ecological equivalence in biodiversity offset schemes: Key issues and solutions

By F. Quétier, S. Lavorel. 2011

340 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e2619420fa18dfc76de2b664423e6e2306f2eff1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Atte Moilanen
2. David B. Lindenmayer
3. T. Gardner

In Global and Planetary Change

1. T. Gardner
2. David B. Lindenmayer
3. Atte Moilanen
4. Kimberly Christie
5. Martine Maron
6. David A. Keith
7. Richard J. Hobbs
8. Clive McAlpine

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Atte Moilanen
2. Kimberly Christie
3. Martine Maron
4. David A. Keith
5. David B. Lindenmayer
6. Richard J. Hobbs
7. T. Gardner
8. Clive McAlpine

Citations in the corpus

• Faustian bargains? Restoration realities in the context of biodiversity offset policies (2012, background): “Offsets should account for these time-lags, because it is not considered fair to compensate immediate loss by hypothetical equal gains in the distant future (Norton, 2009; Moilanen et al., 2009; Quétier and Lavorel, 2011).”