Faustian bargains? Restoration realities in the context of biodiversity offset policies

By Martine Maron, Richard J. Hobbs, Atte Moilanen, Jeffrey W. Matthews, Kimberly Christie, T. Gardner, David A. Keith, David B. Lindenmayer, Clive McAlpine. 2012

536 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c6f7a9aad7378008c5ba4c78e87aa0bea76305e9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. John J. Wiens
2. Hugh P. Possingham
3. Neville D. Crossman
4. Sabah Abdullah
5. A. Coggan
6. Stuart Whitten
7. E. Buitelaar
8. A. Cowie

In Global and Planetary Change

1. John J. Wiens
2. Graciela I. Metternicht
3. Martine Maron
4. Hugh P. Possingham
5. Neville D. Crossman
6. Peter J. Mumby
7. Richard J. Hobbs
8. A. Coggan

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Martine Maron
2. Peter J. Mumby
3. Richard J. Hobbs
4. Sabah Abdullah
5. E. Buitelaar
6. Jeffrey Bennett

Citations in the corpus

• Integrating Conservation and Restoration in a Changing World (2015, background): “Where the damages are associated with human uses of resources (e.g., mining, clear-cut logging), the restoration may be prompted by regulations that require the repair or mitigation of damages or actions elsewhere to offset the anthropogenic damages (Maron et al. 2012).”
• Land in balance: The scientific conceptual framework for Land Degradation Neutrality (2018, background): “S3), but is not likely to reach 100% of lost productivity and other ecosystem services, at least in the short to medium term (Benayas et al., 2009; Maron et al., 2012) Therefore, the most effective approach for maintaining land-based natural capital is to prevent land degradation where non-degraded ”
• Factors that influence transaction costs in development offsets: Who bears what and why? (2013, background): “There is much debate within the ecological literature surrounding what can be used as an offset (Gibbons and Lindenmayer, 2007; Maron et al., 2012).”
• Balancing economic costs and ecological outcomes of passive and active restoration in agricultural landscapes: the case of Brazil (2016, background): “Many factors, however, still limit the technical effectiveness of ecological restoration for conserving biodiversity and the supply of ecosystem services (Birch et al. 2010, Maron et al. 2012, Shoo et al. in press).”
• The cost and feasibility of marine coastal restoration. (2015, background): “However, to achieve no net loss of coastal habitats (e.g., biodiversity offset policies (Maron et al. 2012, Bull et al. 2013, Bell et al. 2014, and Bell et al. 2014) the scale of restoration of coastal marine ecosystems should at least match the scale of degradation.”