Ecology, Conservation, and Public Policy

By Donald Ludwig, Marc Mangel, B. Haddad. 2001

333 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e25616fc97b2f04fb0b700955df27ed2dc5d8658

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

RESILIENCE: THE EMERGENCE OF A PERSPECTIVE FOR SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS ANALYSES (2006, background): “The book Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems (Gunderson and Holling, 2002), an outcome of the Resilience Network, explores such interactions and ask questions like; Why are ecosystems not just physical systems, like piles of sand? Why are social systems not just ecos”
Effective monitoring of freshwater fish (2019, background): “Given on-going environmental change, the decision-making approach of adaptive management, based on ‘learning by doing’, is generally a preferred option to integrate scientific knowledge into the policy-making process (Ludwig et al., 2001).”
ECOLOGICAL FUTURES: BUILDING AN ECOLOGY OF THE LONG NOW1 (2002, background): “The usual tools of decision analysis do not apply to problems in which objectives are ambiguous and there are multiple, contradictory approaches, each one plausible from a particular viewpoint (Funtowicz et al. 1999, Ludwig 2001, Ludwig et al. 2001).”
Unpacking “Participation” in the Adaptive Management of Social–ecological Systems: a Critical Review (2006, background): “Participation can, therefore, take place in the exploration of a management problem but also in goal setting, planning, and monitoring (McLain and Lee 1996, Johannes 1998, Ludwig et al. 2001, Folke 2003).”
The Theoretical Biologist's Toolbox: Quantitative Methods for Ecology and Evolutionary Biology (2006, background): “Whether it is better to overfish the stock or lose sustainable yield is a question that cannot be answered by quantitative methods alone (and may not even be within the purview of quantitative methods (Ludwig et al. 2001)), but it is clear that averaging uncertain values as a means of attaining a ‘‘”
Implications of current ecological thinking for biodiversity conservation: A review of the salient issues (2005, background): “An associated critical issue for both ecologists and managers is determining ways and means of including societal values in decisions about biodiversity management (Franz 2001, Ludwig et al. 2001, Davis and Slobodkin 2004).”
A Special Section on Dam Removal and River Restoration (2002, background): “Such enhanced interdisciplinary dialogue and unified approaches are essential for creating public policies that can sustain the planet’s life support systems (Lubchenco 1998, Covich 2000, Ludwig et al. 2001).”
Regime Shifts, Resilience, and Biodiversity in Ecosystem Management (2004, background): “All rights reserved First published online as a Review in Advance on August 5, 2004 REGIME SHIFTS, RESILIENCE, AND BIODIVERSITY IN ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT”
Does Adaptive Management of Natural Resources Enhance Resilience to Climate Change (2004, background): “Decision making in fisheries management, pollution control, coastal zone management, and flood control is characterized by uncertainty as to the outcome of decisions (Ludwig et al. 2001).”
The Paradigm of Management, Management Systems, and Resource Stewardship (2009, background): “…et al. 2001; Rittel and Webber 1973), we need a view of management systems that recognizes the underlying complexity, dynamics, diversity, and stochasticity of both the biophysical systems and the social systems that are part of the problem (e.g., Ludwig et al. 2001; Folke et al. 2004; Wang 2002).”
An alien approach to invasive species: objectivity and society in invasion biology (2007, background): “…not engage with extensive discussions of advocacy and objectivity in conservation biology elsewhere (Barry and Oelschlaeger 1996; Kaiser 2000; Allen et al. 2001; Bradshaw and Bekoff 2001; Franz 2001; Ludwig et al. 2001; Rykiel 2001; Weber and Word 2001; Lach et al. 2003; Wallington and Moore 2005).”
Eliciting Expert Knowledge in Conservation Science (2012, background): “Nevertheless, there remains ongoing controversy about use of expert judgments (Ludwig et al. 2001; Kuhnert 2011).”
Social–ecological systems and adaptive governance of the commons (2006, background): “The recognition is spreading that many ‘disciplinary maps’ only partially capture the understanding we need to interpret the dynamic world that we live in (e.g. Ludwig et al. 2001).”
Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. (2010, background): “…that western paradigms and systems of knowledge are currently not able to deal with the full complexity of environmental management (Johannes, 1998; Ludwig et al., 2001), nor sufficiently able to integrate local stakeholder perspectives in the development of environmental management strategies…”
Defining and using 'best available science': a policy conundrum for the management of aquatic ecosystems. (2010, background): “Addressing wicked problems requires the involvement of players from many disciplines and with many different types of knowledge (Ludwig et al. 2001), and it will invariably be controversial (Durant and Legge 2006).”