Shareholding Versus Stakeholding: a critical review of corporate governance
By S. Letza, Xiuping Sun, J. Kirkbride. 2004
451 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e2409d658740a218ffc1f79b3ae26f3dc92c522e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Ruth V. Aguilera
- Roberto García-Castro
- Miguel Ángel Ariño
- Gregory Jackson
- Miguel A. Rodríguez
- Silvia Ayuso
- Igor Filatotchev
- Richard Deeg
In Strategy and Management
- Ruth V. Aguilera
- Roberto García-Castro
- Miguel Ángel Ariño
- Miguel A. Rodríguez
- Gregory Jackson
- Silvia Ayuso
- Jinsoo Hwang
- Tarek Abdelfattah
Citations in the corpus
- Stakeholders Under Pressure: Corporate Governance and Labour Management in Germany and Japan (2005, unknown): “Most literature in corporate governance has been strongly polarised in debates over the shareholder vs stakeholder perspectives ( Letza et al. , 2004 ).”
- The Relative Value Relevance of Shareholder Versus Stakeholder Corporate Governance Disclosure Policy Reforms in South Africa (2012, unknown): “, 2008; Starks, 2009), as well as offers an empirical dimension t the debate on whether disclosing shareholder or stakeholder CG practices contributes more to fi rm value (Friedman, 1970; Letza et al., 2004).”
- Responsible Corporate Governance: Towards a Stakeholder Board of Directors? (2009, unknown): “Broadly speaking, we can differentiate between a shareholder perspective and a stakeholder perspective of the firm ( Letza et al., 2004; Szwajkowski, 2000; Vinten, 2001).”
- The Impact of Board Gender Diversity and Foreign Institutional Investors on the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Engagement of Chinese Listed Companies (2019, background): “Letza, Sun [46] further argued that the instrumental component of the stakeholder theory and the agency theory suppose the human nature is self-interested, and managers cannot be trusted to efficiently satisfy the principal’s interests.”
- Maximizing Stakeholders' Interests: An Empirical Analysis of the Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Governance (2014, unknown): “In corporate governance, the normative stakeholder theory has its origins in the social entity conception of the corporation, developed in the later part of the 19 century (Letza et al., 2004).”
- Maximizing Stakeholders’ Interests (2012, background): “Instrumental stakeholder theory is often connected with the pluralistic model of corporate governance (Letza et al., 2004).”
- Comparative and International Corporate Governance (2010, background): “…the firm should be vested in managers, and these should take into account stakeholders only to the extent that long-term shareholder value is created thereby—see debates in Gamble and Kelly (2001), Letza, Sun, and Kirkbride (2004), O’Sullivan (2003), Vinten (2001), and Yoshikawa and Rasheed (2009).”
- Corporate irresponsibility and corporate social responsibility: competing realities (2009, background): “Much of the emphasis has been placed upon businesses and business people to act in a more socially responsible manner and to acknowledge that shareholders are only one of a number of business stakeholders ( Letza et al. , 2004”