Stakeholders Under Pressure: Corporate Governance and Labour Management in Germany and Japan

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Comparative and International Corporate Governance (2010, methodology): “system is designed around the normative notion of shareholder value, whereas the Japanese model reflects a greater commitment to employee welfare (Jackson, 2005; Jackson & Moerke, 2005).”
Bundles of Firm Corporate Governance Practices: A Fuzzy Set Analysis (2013, unknown): “By contrast, high employee loyalty is aligned with other insider CG practices that induce a more active role of employees, as their investments in firm-specific capital are protected from breaches of trust (Aoki, 2001; Blair, 1995; Jackson, 2005).”
Corporate Governance Deviance (2016, unknown): “8 The social rights country type adopts a stakeholder-oriented governance logic prototypical of Germany where the primary goal of the firm and its governance is to balance the interests of all stakeholders involved in the firm (Jackson, 2005).”
From comparing capitalisms to the politics of institutional change (2008, background): “Likewise, broad categories such as ‘coordinated’ may lead one to overlook important changes within such broad types which fall short of complete shifts to the opposite bipolar category ( Deeg, 2005 ; Jackson, 2005b ; Vitols, 2004 ).”