Testing and Measuring the Role of Ideas: The Case of Neoliberalism in the International Monetary Fund

166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The economics of the democratic deficit: The effect of IMF programs on inequality (2016, background): “As a result, there is substantial evidence suggesting that policies stipulating reduced public spending as well as trade and financial liberalization are associated to these ideological preferences of IMF staff (Barnett and Finnemore 1999; Chwieroth 2007a; Nelson 2014).”
Neoliberal Economists and Capital Account Liberalization in Emerging Markets (2007, background): “…in which appointments were situated+ The logic of the credibility model depends on the beliefs or sentiment shared by members of the 19+ Best 2005, chap+ 5+ Chwieroth 2007b provides a fuller treatment of the evolution of the economic profession’s ideas about capital controls+ 20+ For a summary…”
The International Monetary Fund: A review of the recent evidence (2008, background): “Chwieroth (2007) tests for an effect of neoclassical training of IMF staff (which increases over time) on the likelihood of capital account liberalization in program countries, but without observing whether those measures are included in conditionality.”