The eBird enterprise: An integrated approach to development and application of citizen science
By Brian L. Sullivan, Jocelyn L Aycrigg, Jessie Barry, R. Bonney, Nicholas E. Bruns, C. Cooper, T. Damoulas, A. Dhondt, Thomas G. Dietterich, Andrew Farnsworth and 22 more. 2014
1,001 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3d5049f3321802aefa9885c82e6de50c9f91b155
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecological Modeling
- Serge J. Belongie
- K. Böhning‐Gaese
- Pietro Perona
- Chris D. Preston
- Susanne A. Fritz
- Grant Van Horn
- Matthias Schleuning
- Michael J. O. Pocock
In Ecology
- K. Böhning‐Gaese
- Serge J. Belongie
- A. Rodewald
- Susanne A. Fritz
- Matthias Schleuning
- Chris D. Preston
- Michael J. O. Pocock
- Fabrice A. DeClerck
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- In crowdfunding we trust: A trust-building model in lending crowdfunding (2020, neutral): “crowd phenomena, such as citizen science (Aristeidou, Scanlon, & Sharples, 2017; Sullivan et al., 2014; Wildschut, 2017) and crowdsourcing (Cappa, Oriani, Pinelli, & De Massis, 2019; Ghezzi, Gabelloni, Martini, & Natalicchio, 2018; Howe, 2006; Maiolini & Naggi, 2011; Piazza, Mazzola, Acur, & Perrone”
- Analytical guidelines to increase the value of community science data: An example using eBird data to estimate species distributions (2021, methodology): “We describe analytical approaches for using semi- structured CS data, using the example of estimating species distributions from data collected by the eBird CS project (Sullivan et al., 2014).”
- Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBAs): the development and characteristics of a global inventory of key sites for biodiversity (2018, methodology): “This might be helped by the use of increasing volumes of citizen science data, generated by schemes such as eBird (Sullivan et al. 2014), BirdTrack (http://app.bto.org/birdtrack/main/data-home.jsp) and BirdLasser (https://www.birdlasser.com/), and of apps for smartphones, which can be used to…”
- Novel seasonal land cover associations for eastern North American forest birds identified through dynamic species distribution modelling (2016, methodology): “We addressed these questions using dynamic SDMs based on occurrence data from eBird, a global online checklist program of bird observations collected across a range of spatial and temporal scales (Sullivan et al., 2014).”
- The role of atmospheric conditions in the seasonal dynamics of North American migration flyways (2014, methodology): “…derived from spatio-temporal exploratory models (STEM; Fink et al., 2010) and occurrence information from the eBird citizen-science database (Sullivan et al., 2014) for the combined period 2004 to 2011 to test for the presence of geographically distinct migration flyways within the…”
- Robust sound event detection in bioacoustic sensor networks (2019, background): “continental) scales are weather surveillance radar data [30] and crowdsourced observations of birders [31].”
- AVONET: morphological, ecological and geographical data for all birds. (2022, methodology): “We did not generate new maps for the eBird dataset which can be integrated directly with citizen-science locality data and a suite of spatial research tools (Sullivan et al., 2014).”
- Assessing data quality in citizen science (preprint) (2016, background): “Similarly, eBird assists its volunteers with dynamically generated dataentry forms that list the most common birds for a volunteer’s given location and time, increasing both volunteer awareness of the local species and data quality (Sullivan et al. 2014).”
- Unstructured citizen science data fail to detect long‐term population declines of common birds in Denmark (2016, background): “Casual observations collected without following a structured protocol by members of the public may potentially contribute to research and conservation, and a growing number of unstructured ‘citizen science’ databases have become available in recent years (Devictor et al., 2010; Sullivan et al., 2014”
- Contributions from citizen science to science education: an examination of a biodiversity citizen science project with schools in Central Europe (2018, background): “Citizen science (CS), i.e. involving citizens in scientific research projects, has become increasingly popular (Conrad & Hilchey, 2011; Sullivan et al., 2014).”
- Lean Multiclass Crowdsourcing (2018, background): “GBIF [33]) that enable global biodiversity studies [29].”
- Synthesizing multiple data types for biological conservation using integrated population models (2018, background): “…in an IPM framework (i.e., with local-scale capture-recapture data) has the potential to reveal large-scale population trends, shifts in species niches, and/or the varying importance of demographic processes across spatial and temporal scales (Sauer and Link, 2011; Sullivan et al., 2014).”
- The Biological Records Centre: a pioneer of citizen science (2015, methodology): “The NBN Record Cleaner has been developed since 2001, but other citizen science projects have subsequently independently developed a similar framework of automated and expert verification (Bonter & Cooper, 2012; Sullivan et al., 2014).”