A model for fossil energy use in Danish agriculture used to compare organic and conventional farming

499 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Rainfed crop energy balance of different farming systems and crop rotations in a semi-arid environment: Results of a long-term trial (2011, unknown): “Dalgaard et al. (2001), Jørgensen et al. (2005), Gündoğmuş (2006), Gündoğmuş and Bayramoğlu (2006), Hoeppner et al. (2006), Bos et al. (2007), Caporali et al. (2007), Klimeková and Lehocká (2007), and Baum et al. (2009), among others, compared organic and conventional systems; Hernanz et…”
Decisions to reduce greenhouse gases from agriculture and product transport: LCA case study of organic and conventional wheat (2009, background): “Previous work that compares organic and conventional practices typically does not include transport processes [3,17,18], even though these impacts can be substantial.”
LCA of soybean meal (2008, methodology): “N 2 O emissions were calculated according to IPCC (2000), and the diesel use was modeled according to Dalgaard et al. (2001) .”
A case study of energy use and economical analysis of irrigated and dryland wheat production systems (2011, background): “Low input agricultural systems compared to high input systems have greater energy use efficiency and lower emissions of greenhouse gasses [6].”