Evidence for long‐term site fidelity of snapper (Pagrus auratus) within a marine reserve

By Trevor J. Willis, D. Parsons, R. Babcock. 2001

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e1b7be18384ae715e68ea72535ac5a76bf05ce98

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Snapper Pagrus auratus (Sparidae) home range dynamics : acoustic tagging studies in a marine reserve (2003, background): “While some previous studies have been successful in obtaining repetitive locations of individual snapper, the duration of sampling was either too short (Berquist 1994) or the number of locations too few (Willis et al. 2001) to assess snapper home-range size.”
Do partial marine reserves protect reef fish assemblages (2004, background): “…as juveniles, whereas adults can be found near reefs or in open water (Kingsford, 1989; Francis, 2001), snapper can become permanent residents on particular areas of reefs (Willis et al., 2001), and kingfish are largely reef associated rather than ocean pelagics (Saul and Holdsworth, 1991).”
Dangerous targets? Unresolved issues and ideological clashes around marine protected areas (2003, background): “Indeed, none of the changes now seen in New Zealand’s no-take MPAs (Towns and Ballantine, 1993; Babcock et al., 1999; Kelly et al., 2000; Willis et al., 2000 ) were or could be predicted at the outset of their program.”
Snapper (Chrysophrys auratus): a review of life history and key vulnerabilities in New Zealand (2014, background): “Conversely, other tagging studies have demonstrated that the tagged fish utilised areas as small as a few hundred metres (Willis et al. 2001; Hartill et al. 2003; Parsons et al. 2003; Egli & Babcock 2004; Parsons et al. 2010).”
MARINE RESERVES AND OCEAN NEIGHBORHOODS: The Spatial Scale of Marine Populations and Their Management (2004, background): “Snappers in subtropical or temperate areas can have home ranges as small as a few 100 meters (74).”
Density-dependent spillover from a marine reserve: long-term evidence (2005, background): “Recovery of populations in reserves, and subsequent spillover, would require that some individuals residing in a reserve usually remain within the reserve (Willis et al. 2001).”
Rapid recolonisation of snapper Pagrus auratus: Sparidae within an offshore island marine reserve after implementation of no-take status (2004, background): “Changes in the density of legal snapper between 185 Mar Ecol Prog Ser 272: 183–190, 2004 spring surveys were examined, as fish present during spring are likely to be residents (Willis et al. 2001).”
Connectivity, sustainability, and yield: bridging the gap between conventional fisheries management and marine protected areas (2009, background): “In addition to variability among species in the scale and patterns of movement, there is often variability within species as different individuals exhibit polymorphic movement behavior (Quinn and Brodeur 1991; Attwood and Bennett 1994; Willis et al. 2001; Starr et al. 2004).”
Ultrasonic tracking reveals multiple behavioural modes of snapper (Pagrus auratus) in a temperate no-take marine reserve (2004, methodology): “This theory is at odds with the observed build-up of snapper abundance and spatial distribution in the Cape Rodney to Okakari Point (CROP) reserve (Willis et al., 2000, 2003), and is more consistent with an alternative theory of polymorphic snapper behaviour, where a proportion of P. auratus are yea”
Paradigm shifts in marine fisheries genetics: ugly hypotheses slain by beautiful facts (2008, background): “Many of the species in Table 1 are relatively sedentary as adults (e.g. Willis et al. 2001), even though they exchange recruits via larval dispersal – adult habitats are therefore 1Two offspring per parent are required in a stable population, because in sexual species, each offspring has two…”