MARINE RESERVES AND OCEAN NEIGHBORHOODS: The Spatial Scale of Marine Populations and Their Management
By Stephen R. Palumbi. 2004
545 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/70673752454766fc85f3f91d2f266bd47ac98f66
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- G. Hays
- Bj Godley
- Brian W. Bowen
- Lucy A. Hawkes
- AC Broderick
- Stephen R. Palumbi
- S. Gaines
- Geoffrey P. Jones
In Global and Planetary Change
- G. Hays
- Bj Godley
- Lucy A. Hawkes
- AC Broderick
- Stephen R. Palumbi
- Michael S. Coyne
- Geoffrey P. Jones
- S. Gaines
In Oceanography
Citations in the corpus
- Phylogeography and the conservation of coral reef fishes (2007, background): “promote both eVective species protection and spill-over to non-protected areas (Palumbi 2004).”
- Deep-water Corallium rubrum (L., 1758) from the Mediterranean Sea: preliminary genetic characterisation (2010, background): “…of evolutionary significant units (ESU) are important parameters for conservation strategies, as small and isolated populations are vulnerable to inbreeding depression, which might reduce their evolutionary potential and increase their risk of extinction (Saccheri et al. 1998; Palumbi 2004).”
- Modeling population connectivity by ocean currents, a graph-theoretic approach for marine conservation (2007, background): “At the local level, considering the direction and persistence of dispersal within the upstream/downstream neighborhood context would allow local managers to gain insight into potential larval sources and develop management solutions aligned with persistent dispersal routes and across the appropriate”
- Extreme genetic diversity and temporal rather than spatial partitioning in a widely distributed coral reef fish (2007, background): “Moreover a recent focus on dispersal as a signiWcant process in ecology and evolutionary biology both in a general (Kinlan and Gaines 2003; de Queiroz 2005) and speciWcally marine context ( Palumbi 2003, 2004; Kinlan et al. 2005) has provided an additional impetus for the genetic analysis of popula”
- Dynamic ocean management: Defining and conceptualizing real-time management of the ocean (2015, unknown): “Static management approaches can lead to large areas being placed off-limits to human uses [51], possibly generating a considerable economic cost, as occurred in the Hawaii pelagic longline fishery where a closure to protect sea turtles in 2000 cost fishermen over US$50,000 per turtle take reduction”
- Passive acoustic telemetry reveals highly variable home range and movement patterns among unicornfish within a marine reserve (2011, background): “While the synergistic effects of home range size and mobility, fishing pressure and marine reserve characteristics have the greatest influence on how a species responds to protection (Palumbi 2004), fish mobility is rarely reported in the marine reserve literature (Claudet et al. 2008).”
- Home on the range: spatial ecology of loggerhead turtles in Atlantic waters of the USA (2011, background): “Despite the nesting population being well studied, in many respects, there have been comparatively few data published about specific aspects of their spatial and temporal distribution and habitat utilization of adults; information that is important for the designation of appropriate protected areas ”
- The relationship between population genetic structure and pelagic larval duration in coral reef fishes on the Great Barrier Reef (2006, background): “Identifying the patterns of connectivity among populations and the extent of self-recruitment is important to the study of the population biology of marine species (e.g., Jones et al. 1999; Swearer et al. 1999; Taylor and Hellberg 2003) and to the effective management and conservation of marine reso”
- Cooperatives, concessions, and co-management on the Pacific coast of Mexico (2014, background): “Several fish species associated with rocky and coral reefs, and with estuaries and lagoons, though potentially mobile, tend to exhibit site fidelity and low dispersal [79].”
- Non-linear genetic isolation by distance: implications for dispersal estimation in anadromous and marine fish populations (2007, background): “Palumbi (2004) suggested that IBD should be required for dispersal estimates, but this stipulation may limit estimates to species with restricted dispersal.”
- The ecology of rafting in the marine environment. III. Biogeographical and evolutionary consequences (2006, background): “1999) and genetic connectivity (Palumbi 2003), among others, that many marine species have restricted dispersal, suggesting that their populations might not be demographically open or that dispersal distances of many marine organisms may be shorter than expected (Jones et al. 1999; Swearer et al. 19”
- Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management (2010, background): “However, rapidly emergingdataon scalesof movement for a diverse range of species suggest that moderately sized reserves that are several to tens of kilometers in alongshore length and extend offshore to encompass depth-related movements should be suitable to contain adult movement for much of the di”
- Conservation and fisheries effects of spawning aggregation marine protected areas: What we know, where we should go, and what we need to get there (2014, background): “Long-lived populations may only show clear signs of recovery after decades of effective protection (Russ and Alcala, 2010; Sadovy de Mitcheson and Colin, 2012a), and recruitment subsidy will not occur until biomass (or sex ratio) has improved (Palumbi, 2004).”