Identifying “deterrable” offenders: Implications for research on deterrence

By Greg Pogarsky. 2002

283 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e1a8dd5ec9b2ff76d1ea9588ebab9229fee32d34

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Sanctions, Perceived Anger, and Criminal Offending (2004, methodology): “Pogarsky (2002) observed that perceived sanction threats were operative only for some offenders (marginals) but inoperative for another subset of offenders (the incorrigibles).”
Can Punishment Encourage Offending? Investigating The “resetting” Effect (2003, background): “…thereafter appeared more likely to offend in the future (a positive punishment effect) and believed the certainty of punishment was lower than did their less punished/unpunished counterparts.2 Other studies reported similar results (cf. Paternoster and Piquero 1995; Piquero and Pogarsky 2002).”
In the Eye of the Impulsive Beholder (2009, background): “Others have found either no moderating effect (Nagin & Pogarsky, 2001) or a curvilinear effect in which individuals either high or low in impulsivity were the most affected by perceived deterrence (Piquero & Pogarsky, 2002).”
Do perceptions of punishment vary between white-collar and street crimes? (2007, background): “…the effect of sanction threats and sanction imposition, but in general this line of research suggested that sanctions and sanction threats did emerge and did inhibit criminal activity (Nagin, 1998), at least for some segment of the population (Pogarsky, 2002).1 Despite this ⁎ Corresponding author.”
Does the Perceived Risk of Punishment Deter Criminally Prone Individuals? Rational Choice, Self-Control, and Crime (2004, methodology): “Our results also differ from those recently reported by Pogarsky (2002).”
Deterrence and Individual Differences Among Convicted Offenders (2007, unknown): “A similar typology was elaborated by Pogarsky (2002) .”
Modeling Change in Perceptions about Sanction Threats: The Neglected Linkage in Deterrence Theory (2004, background): “Pogarsky and Piquero (2003) advanced a "re-setting" hypothesis designed to account for the finding that punishment does not always have the intended effect of deterring the one punished.”
Why Do People Comply with the Law? Legitimacy and the Influence of Legal Institutions (2012, background): “5 For more nuanced accounts of the interplay of moral and instrumental motivations, see; Nagin and Paternoster, 1993; Pogarsky, 2002; Jacobs, 2010; Kronenberg et al., 2010; Matsueda et al., 2006).”