Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar

By R. Levine, Walt Detmar Meurers. 2006

923 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e0aa13cb23789be5c4bfb59f8d64fdef9f9a75fa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Language and Linguistics

Citations in the corpus

A* CCG Parsing with a Supertag and Dependency Factored Model (2017, background): “For Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG; Pollard and Sag (1994)), there are studies to use the predicted dependency structure to improve HPSG parsing accuracy.”
The Syntax of Valuation and the Interpretability of Features (2006, background): “Agree thus takes two occurrences of F and turns them into two instances of F. Adapting a notation from the HPSG literature, we will use indices in brackets to indicate multiple instances of a single feature.”
Tough-Constructions and Their Derivation (2009, background): “Picture-noun reflexives in the sort of environment in (41) are often suspected of not being true re-flexives and so not subject to a requirement for local binding during the derivation (e.g., Pollard and Sag 1992, 1994, Reinhart and Reuland 1993; see Hicks 2009 for detailed discussion).”
Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Parsing on Penn Treebank (2019, background): “, 1988) and headdriven phrase structure grammar (HPSG) (Pollard and Sag, 1994) which is a constraint-based highly lexicalized non-derivational generative grammar”
Accuracy vs. Robustness in Grammar Engineering (2010, methodology): “As an implementation within the theoretical framework of Headdriven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG: Pollard & Sag, 1994), the ERG has since its inception encoded both morphosyntactic and semantic properties of English, in a declarative representation that enables 1The first version of the English…”
Structural priming: a critical review. (2008, background): “(It should be noted that this discussion could be cast in terms of other formal linguistic accounts, such as Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar [Pollard & Sag, 1994], Lexical–Functional Grammar [Bresnan & Kaplan, 1982], or Combinatory Categorical Grammar [Steedman, 2000].”
Dissociations between Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations (2005, positive): “2A-command, a-bound, and a-free are the same notions as o-command, o-bound, and o-free from Pollard and Sag (1994), now defined on arg-st, but the new names are meant to evoke the argument structure based theory of binding we employ.”
SAVE: A framework for semantic annotation of visual events (2008, methodology): “HPSG consists of two main components: a highly structured representation of grammatical categories; and a set of descriptive constraints for phrasal construction.”
RNNs as psycholinguistic subjects: Syntactic state and grammatical dependency (2018, background): “…to two constraints: (1) it must agree in gender and number with its antecedent, and (2) approximately, its antecedent must be the syntactically most local NP that c-commands it (Rein-hart, 1981; see Pollard and Sag, 1994 for a closely related characterization in a lexicalist syntactic framework).”
The logic of syntactic priming and acceptability judgments (2016, neutral): “It also suggests that these are ‘shallow’ and monostratal, in a way that corresponds at least roughly to the assumptions of Culicover and Jackendoff (2005) and many other non-transformational theories (e.g., Gazdar et al. 1985; Goldberg 1995; Pollard and Sag 1994; Steedman 2000).”
Noun‐Phrase Structure by Reprojection (2010, background): “Also cf. Pollard & Sag (1994), Wunderlich (1997), and Lechner (2004), among many others, for implementations in different theoretical frameworks.”
Deep Multitask Learning for Semantic Dependency Parsing (2017, background): “LinGO is a head-driven phrase structure grammar (HPSG; Pollard and Sag, 1994) with minimal recursion semantics (Copestake et al.”
UnNatural Language Inference (2020, background): “…syntactic formalisms, like Lexical Functional Grammar (Kaplan and Bresnan, 1995; Bres-nan et al., 2015, LFG), Head-drive Phrase Structure Grammar (Pollard and Sag, 1994, HPSG) or Lex-icalized Tree Adjoining Grammar (Schabes et al., 1988; Abeille, 1990, LTAG), are “lexicalized”, i.e., individual…”
Periphrasis as collocation (2015, methodology): “In the HPSG approach to extraction, fillers are licensed through the percolation of the SLASH feature, which ensures that the distant filler is interpreted as satisfying the selectional requirements imposed by the head at the extraction site.”
Data from eye-tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity. (2008, positive): “Note that this assumption is compatible with syntactic theories such as Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar (Pollard & Sag, 1994), which assume that auxiliaries inherit the subcategorization frame of the main verb, and that dependents are unified (integrated) into the subcategorization frame at…”
The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky) (2005, positive): “…1988; Fillmore, Kay, & O'Connor, 1988; Zwicky, 1994; Goldberg, 1995, to appear), Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (Ginzburg & Sag, 2000; Pollard & Sag, 1987, 1994), Cognitive Grammar (Langacker, 1998), Lexical Functional Grammar (Bresnan, 1982), and Parallel Architecture/Simpler Syntax…”