A comparison of methods for the statistical analysis of spatial point patterns in plant ecology
By George L. W. Perry, B. Miller, Neal J. Enright. Plant Ecology, 2006
367 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Geometry and Topology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e09ba5a176970bf28051bd951323874e0ac526af
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Environmental Engineering
- Fangliang He
- P. Grabarnik
- Mari Myllymäki
- Kerstin Wiegand
- Stephan Getzin
- A. Fajardo
- Zhanqing Hao
- Ji Ye
In Geometry and Topology
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Beyond description: the active and effective way to infer processes from spatial patterns. (2009, background): “This perspective has prevailed because of several known biological phenomena: (1) various processes may create the same pattern (Cale et al. 1989, Perry et al. 2006); (2) causality may not be straightforward (Rees et al. 1996, Turner et al. 2001) (e.g., well-defined nonrandom processes can produce…”
- Scale-dependent competition at the stand level assessed from crown areas (2008, background): “At the stand level, competition can be detected via increased inter-tree distances due to natural thinning (Perry et al., 2006).”
- Vertical structure and spatial associations of dominant tree species in an old-growth temperate forest (2007, background): “Therefore, it confounds effects at large scales with effects at small scales because it is a cumulative measure and each larger scale includes the information from all smaller scales (Condit et al., 2000; Schurr et al., 2004; Wiegand and Moloney, 2004; George et al., 2006 ).”
- Heterogeneity influences spatial patterns and demographics in forest stands (2008, methodology): “Due to its non-cumulative properties, g ( r ) is recommended for exploratory data analysis to identify specific scales of deviation from a null model (Wiegand & Moloney 2004; Perry et al . 2006; Illian et al . 2008).”
- Correct testing of mark independence for marked point patterns (2011, background): “A wide range of summary statistics are available to analyze and characterize spatial point patterns (see, e.g., Dale et al., 2002; Perry et al., 2006).”
- An area-based nonparametric spatial point pattern test: The test, its applications, and the future (2016, background): “However, the analysis of spatial point patterns is of interest to a number of disciplines including criminology (Ratcliffe, 2005), ecology (Perry et al., 2006), and epidemiology (Elliott et al., 2000).”
- Ecological information from spatial patterns of plants: insights from point process theory (2009, methodology): “2000; Waagepetersen 2007) and are being applied in plant ecology (Couteron et al. 2003; Shimatani & Kubota 2004; Perry et al. 2006; Wiegand et al. 2007a).”
- Analysis of long-term dynamics of crowns of sessile oaks at the stand level by means of spatial statistics (2008, methodology): “The latter may make the comparison of Clark and Evans indexes difficult when they are computed from point patterns of different densities (Perry et al., 2006).”