Correct testing of mark independence for marked point patterns

By P. Grabarnik, Mari Myllymäki, Dietrich Stoyan. 2011

77 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Geometry and Topology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/16cd69dc5bd443ef754b04524c12c096a505ca55

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

1. Gopalan M. Nair
2. Andrew Hardegen
3. Robin K. Milne
4. Peter J. Diggle
5. Adrian Baddeley
6. Edith Gabriel
7. Jesper Møller
8. Rasmus Waagepetersen

In Geometry and Topology

1. Gopalan M. Nair
2. Adrian Baddeley
3. Edith Gabriel
4. Jesper Møller
5. Rasmus Waagepetersen
6. Ute Hahn
7. Yongtao Guan

Citations in the corpus

• On tests of spatial pattern based on simulation envelopes (2014, background): “Many writers have agreed, advising that ‘‘envelope tests should not be thought of as formal tests of significance’’ (Law et al. 2009:619) and drawing a distinction between invalid envelope tests and valid deviation tests (Grabarnik et al. 2011).”
• Estimating Second-Order Characteristics of Inhomogeneous Spatio-Temporal Point Processes (2013, methodology): “…(between 0.02 and 0.04 for K and between 0.04 and 0.1 for g according to the edge correction method); see Loos-more and Ford (2006) and Grabarnik et al (2011) for a guidance on the use of envelop tests and deviation tests. b The probability of detecting clustering is expected to be…”