Continuous shear thickening transitions in model concentrated colloids—The role of interparticle forces
By J. Melrose, R. Ball. 2004
139 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Materials Chemistry
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e0511cc0b7f37b34dee917f35102df6f9c4d035e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
In Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
- D. Feys
- G. de Schutter
- R. Verhoeven
- Jeffrey F. Morris
- Heinrich M. Jaeger
- Eric Brown
- Michael J. Solomon
- J. Vermant
In Materials Chemistry
- Jeffrey F. Morris
- Eric Brown
- Heinrich M. Jaeger
- D. Feys
- Michael J. Solomon
- J. Vermant
- R. Verhoeven
- G. de Schutter
Citations in the corpus
- Why is fresh self-compacting concrete shear thickening? (2009, background): “From this shear stress on, the relaxation time of the repulsive forces is too large compared to the hydrodynamic forces, causing the particle to remain in the cluster [32,33].”
- The role of dilation and confining stresses in shear thickening of dense suspensions (2010, background): “Simulations of shear thickening colloids have similarly found contact networks between particles with an exponential distribution of forces under shear (Melrose and Ball, 2004b).”
- A review of microstructure in concentrated suspensions and its implications for rheology and bulk flow (2009, background): “These extended structures are believed to be associated with not only shear thickening ( Melrose and Ball 2004a ) but also jamming in sheared suspensions (Lootens et al. 2005).”
- Flow-induced structure in colloidal suspensions (2005, background): “…sensitivity of the lubrication forces to interparticle distance the details of interparticle potential (e.g. deformation of the polymer brush) or particle roughness on microstructure development need to be further understood (Mewis and Biebaut 2001, Wilson and Davis 2000, Melrose and Ball 2004).”