A review of microstructure in concentrated suspensions and its implications for rheology and bulk flow

244 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Structuring processes for meat analogues (2018, unknown): “Rheological measurement can be used for this, via the polymer blending law that was developed by Takanyangi (Morris, 2009; Takayanagi, Harima, & Iwata, 1963): with M being the modulus, ϕ the volume fraction of phase X and phase Y, and n an exponent that is dependent on how the phases react upon defo”
Rheology of sheared suspensions of rough frictional particles (2014, unknown): “Note that Lees-Edwards boundary conditions are not so di ﬃ cult to implement but for higher volume fractions (above 0.5), ordering in monodisperse suspensions is nevertheless expected even in fully periodic conditions (Kulkarni & Morris 2009; Sierou & Brady 2002).”
Dense suspensions in rotating-rod flows: normal stresses and particle migration (2011, background): “However, they may arise from hydrodynamic interactions or direct contact between particles in the case of non-Brownian (non-colloidal) particles (see e.g. Morris 2009).”
Shear thickening, frictionless and frictional rheologies in non-Brownian suspensions (2014, result): “This is consistent with our structure factor data in the gradient-vorticity direction (not shown), which shows only some structure in the gradient direction, and no six-fold symmetry patterns typically observed when string ordering takes place [Laun et al. 1992, Kulkarni and Morris 2009].”